|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Oxskull Duncarino
Shadow Company HQ
246
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 23:07:00 -
[1] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:I'll make sure to encourage everyone I recruit to purchase from CCP. Yep, same as. Although, most people I play with don't have an issue with spending a couple of bob for a fun game, and they don't mind not getting it back after the fun is over. Off course, some cheapskates hanging around these forums think different, but everyone to their own eh |
Oxskull Duncarino
Shadow Company HQ
246
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 23:20:00 -
[2] - Quote
INFINITE DIVERSITY IDIC wrote:Oxskull Duncarino wrote:Maken Tosch wrote:I'll make sure to encourage everyone I recruit to purchase from CCP. Yep, same as. Although, most people I play with don't have an issue with spending a couple of bob for a fun game, and they don't mind not getting it back after the fun is over. Off course, some cheapskates hanging around these forums think different, but everyone to their own eh Ya this cheap skate has spent 300 dollars on this game, including a elite pack, vet pack, and 2 merc packs, not to mention random aur, and boosters, ummm ya so that makes you incorrect? What, the remark hit a bit close did it I was being a bit general about some players on the forums who cry and moan over little things that we were full warned about, but if you want to take it as directed at yourself, maybe there's a reason. Lets see, you've spent over $300 on the game but are in argument over $20 of products you still have that have been altered as you had been warned could potentially happen. Yep, honestly, I really can't see why you might think I called you a cheapskate. No idea at all |
Oxskull Duncarino
Shadow Company HQ
248
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 23:52:00 -
[3] - Quote
INFINITE DIVERSITY IDIC wrote:Oxskull Duncarino wrote:INFINITE DIVERSITY IDIC wrote:Oxskull Duncarino wrote:Maken Tosch wrote:I'll make sure to encourage everyone I recruit to purchase from CCP. Yep, same as. Although, most people I play with don't have an issue with spending a couple of bob for a fun game, and they don't mind not getting it back after the fun is over. Off course, some cheapskates hanging around these forums think different, but everyone to their own eh Ya this cheap skate has spent 300 dollars on this game, including a elite pack, vet pack, and 2 merc packs, not to mention random aur, and boosters, ummm ya so that makes you incorrect? What, the remark hit a bit close did it I was being a bit general about some players on the forums who cry and moan over little things that we were full warned about, but if you want to take it as directed at yourself, maybe there's a reason. Lets see, you've spent over $300 on the game but are in argument over $20 of products you still have that have been altered as you had been warned could potentially happen. Yep, honestly, I really can't see why you might think I called you a cheapskate. No idea at all Look fail troll my point here is simple, I want ccp to make a policy change, Im aware of the warnings, I know the policy, its not just about the 20 dollars in consumables, its about customers spending money with the confidence of the company support that allows for more customers, more spending, and therefore a better game. Very simple for even a cheapskate like my self can understand it. No, what you are attempting to do is promote discord in potential future purchases of Aurum due the fact that you can't handle that your attempt to stockpile OP items backfired on you when CCP changed them. I agree that some more work needs to be done informing people of how it works but to much mollycoddling removes this from being a New Eden game.
What they need to have is to make sure that any changes that will happen will have a minimum of 1 months notice given so players can use what they have without buying more. It's then up to each player whether they want to take the risk of stockpiling.
And another thing, are you that much of a gimp that you used Viktor's FPS skills as a basis for whether his argument was good or not. Any credibility you have is now gone. |
Oxskull Duncarino
Shadow Company HQ
248
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 23:54:00 -
[4] - Quote
Paran Tadec wrote:INFINITE DIVERSITY IDIC wrote:Paran Tadec wrote:INFINITE DIVERSITY IDIC wrote: Dude Im not talking about militia bpos, please go to a post where you are needed or required, your ignorance here is useless to your fanboying.
Lol my fanboying? Tell me again how many times ccp has banned me from these very forums for abusing the devs. I have consistently called ccp out for a while now. You need a reality and or diaper check. Ccp it's only taking away militia bpos for items that are no longer in the game and you will get you r aur back. Buy a booster. Jesus dude your slow, IM NOT TALKING ABOUT MILITIA BPOS, can you really not see that, im talking about items I have, that were changed after my purchase with no reimbursement offered, please tell me you see it this time? What in the hell are you reading and why do you keep talking about militia bpos when Im talking about a policy change? You mean balancing? That happens. Get over it or I will tell your mother to hide her credit card. Lol |
Oxskull Duncarino
Shadow Company HQ
248
|
Posted - 2013.11.23 00:01:00 -
[5] - Quote
Lol. it's time for another beer since I just spat the last one on the monitor laughing. |
Oxskull Duncarino
Shadow Company HQ
248
|
Posted - 2013.11.23 00:12:00 -
[6] - Quote
INFINITE DIVERSITY IDIC wrote:Oxskull Duncarino wrote:INFINITE DIVERSITY IDIC wrote:[quote=Oxskull Duncarino][quote=INFINITE DIVERSITY IDIC] Look fail troll my point here is simple, I want ccp to make a policy change, Im aware of the warnings, I know the policy, its not just about the 20 dollars in consumables, its about customers spending money with the confidence of the company support that allows for more customers, more spending, and therefore a better game. Very simple for even a cheapskate like my self can understand it. No, what you are attempting to do is promote discord in potential future purchases of Aurum due the fact that you can't handle that your attempt to stockpile OP items backfired on you when CCP changed them. I agree that some more work needs to be done informing people of how it works but to much mollycoddling removes this from being a New Eden game. What they need to have is to make sure that any changes that will happen will have a minimum of 1 months notice given so players can use what they have without buying more. It's then up to each player whether they want to take the risk of stockpiling. And another thing, are you that much of a gimp that you used Viktor's FPS skills as a basis for whether his argument was good or not. Any credibility you have is now gone. Again we want to change the policy, and yes I did terrible players having a say is a terrible idea, my opinion so take it how you want. My credibility comes from my gun not scrubs. I do believe even you brain cells have gone the way of the rats. What does a player's FPS skills have to do with a debate on these policy changes? Go on, honestly, I'm really stumped as what kind of argument you can give for that. By your reasoning Stephen Hawking could be one of the worst people to attempt to resolve this. Yep, you've just proved what I though at the start. You're a crybaby, heel drumming idiot. |
Oxskull Duncarino
Shadow Company HQ
248
|
Posted - 2013.11.23 00:20:00 -
[7] - Quote
INFINITE DIVERSITY IDIC wrote:For me people who are totally bad at a thing should have the least opinion about how such a thing should work. Thats just my opinion, lol you can like it or not.
Yeh, yeh, dance around the subject. Again, what does a person's FPS skills have to do with this policy change arguement, a totally different subject to FPS skills? |
Oxskull Duncarino
Shadow Company HQ
248
|
Posted - 2013.11.23 00:28:00 -
[8] - Quote
INFINITE DIVERSITY IDIC wrote:Oxskull Duncarino wrote:INFINITE DIVERSITY IDIC wrote:For me people who are totally bad at a thing should have the least opinion about how such a thing should work. Thats just my opinion, lol you can like it or not.
Yeh, yeh, dance around the subject. Again, what does a person's FPS skills have to do with this policy change arguement, a totally different subject to FPS skills? Thats my answer, im terrible at flying jets, so my opinion on how jets should be flown is useless? You seeing it now? You really are as thick as you come across. Do ya think the majority of people on the board of management for an airline have been or are pilots? How many space rocket designers are astronauts? You seeing it now? Really, you're really beyond being a fool! |
Oxskull Duncarino
Shadow Company HQ
248
|
Posted - 2013.11.23 00:34:00 -
[9] - Quote
INFINITE DIVERSITY IDIC wrote:Oxskull Duncarino wrote:INFINITE DIVERSITY IDIC wrote:Oxskull Duncarino wrote:INFINITE DIVERSITY IDIC wrote:For me people who are totally bad at a thing should have the least opinion about how such a thing should work. Thats just my opinion, lol you can like it or not.
Yeh, yeh, dance around the subject. Again, what does a person's FPS skills have to do with this policy change arguement, a totally different subject to FPS skills? Thats my answer, im terrible at flying jets, so my opinion on how jets should be flown is useless? You seeing it now? You really are as thick as you come across. Do ya think the majority of people on the board of management for an airline have been or are pilots? How many space rocket designers are astronauts? You seeing it now? Really, you're beyond being a fool! Thats true those people are very dependent on the people doing the flying. Lol, I reckon you accidentally bricked you brain when you bricked your suit. Enjoy that little world you exist in. |
Oxskull Duncarino
Shadow Company HQ
248
|
Posted - 2013.11.23 00:46:00 -
[10] - Quote
INFINITE DIVERSITY IDIC wrote:Oxskull Duncarino wrote:INFINITE DIVERSITY IDIC wrote:For me people who are totally bad at a thing should have the least opinion about how such a thing should work. Thats just my opinion, lol you can like it or not.
Oxskull Duncarino wrote:Yeh, yeh, dance around the subject. Again, what does a person's FPS skills have to do with this policy change arguement, a totally different subject to FPS skills? Thats my answer, im terrible at flying jets, so my opinion on how jets should be flown is useless? You seeing it now? Lol, I reckon you accidentally bricked you brain when you bricked your suit. Enjoy that little world you exist in. INFINITE DIVERSITY IDIC wrote:Im going in game now, do me a favor keep trolling this post so it stays at the top where it can be seen and thank you for your assitance. Ill exacerbate your tollish tendencies upon my return I promise. XD
As I aid on another post of the same caliber as yours when they thanked me for the same, my pleasure. It's fun to get other people to join in and laugh pointing the finger. Have a good game |
|
Oxskull Duncarino
Shadow Company HQ
248
|
Posted - 2013.11.24 00:23:00 -
[11] - Quote
Dunk Mujunk wrote:As I said, the time for your issues was before agreeing to the EULA. You can do whatever you feel is needs to be done, but you don't seem to understand CCP is not a Mom and Pop corner store. They covered their bases, and you did not. They put the EULA in place to protect themselves from issues such as this one. They are a business.
If you don't mind sharing, did you not read the EULA, or did you just figure CCP would never exercise their legal right to screw with their licenced property?
I personally own some Dren BPOs and a Saga LAV BPO. CCP has said those are mine to keep, though I would not be surprised at all if one day they are taken from me, seeing as how the EULA clearly states CCP can do whatever they want with the equipment i've purchased. And of course, if the claim is these changes are for the greater good of the game (a game you liked enough to spend money on), I am all for it.
Anyway good luck or whatever. For feck sake, READ the OP. I'm not on board with the attitude these lads have at times but I'll do them the courtesy of at least reading what they want. Much as the thread gets a bit derailed at times the OP's desire is for changes to be made for the future. They're not arguing the past which you think they are, aside from the few detours. |
Oxskull Duncarino
Shadow Company HQ
248
|
Posted - 2013.11.24 00:39:00 -
[12] - Quote
Dunk Mujunk wrote:I understand completely what the OP wants. He can take shots at me and everyone else all he wants, it doesn't change any of the facts. You can champion "changing the way things work" all you want, it's no skin off my balls.
You ever gonna answer the question OP? Did you not read the EULA? Or did you just ignore what it said?
Anyway, y'all have fun trying to pretend your argument pertains to anything other than a legal binding document, I hope your crusade goes nicely.
I, however, cannot support your cause. Maybe because i'm an @sshole, or maybe because I can read, i'll let you decide.
No, what you are is a fool that maybe can read but can't comprehend what he read. Again, the issue here in this thread discussion is not whether or not they feel they have been done wrong by the EULA and are trying to get out of it, but, that they want CCP to set it up in a different manner for the future. The tread where you posted up your response from here is where the argument is over the legality etc of the EULA and the attempt to get out of it. Ya a bit dim or something |
Oxskull Duncarino
Shadow Company HQ
248
|
Posted - 2013.11.24 01:18:00 -
[13] - Quote
Dunk Mujunk wrote:lol. This isn't about a contract, it's about the balance of good and evil, it's about the duality of man, it's about each persons right as an individual to pursue the video game dream laid before all human kind by video god.
Actually, no, it is about a contract.
You see, because of near sighted folk like you ridiculous things like EULAs exist.
Imagine, a world where CCP is unable to continue development of their game because whenever an individual player decided they did not want something in the game to change, they would cry and moan and force CCP to keep things as they are.
In your video game utopia, the flaylock is still as effective as a light weapon, the mass driver is still raining a never ending death, and BPOs of modules that are being removed from the game are still in players inventories because "it's not about legalities".
If CCP was forced to stick with anything any random player didn't want changed, Dust would be jacked up beyond belief. If your beef is about getting your refund, you would be better off not showing your @ss on the forums and dealing with CCP in a respectful mannor, and in private.
If your beef is the way CCP runs it's business, as I said good luck, let me know how it all works out for ya ;-0 Lol, you really are an idiotic, ignorant douche bag. I don't agree with changing anything as I'm happy with the EULA, as I've stated in many other threads. But, I do support people questioning status quo. It's healthy and important to do so. Anyway, whatever. Arguing with a fool of your standard goes nowhere when they can't even grasp the basic subject matter. |
Oxskull Duncarino
Shadow Company HQ
248
|
Posted - 2013.11.24 01:29:00 -
[14] - Quote
Dunk Mujunk wrote:Again, in a strictly legal sense, you are not allowed to complain about what you are complaining about- Dust EULA wrote: You may play DUST 514 by downloading and using CCP's proprietary software (the "Software"). Using the Software allows you to log into CCP's client system (the "System") and interact within the game environment created by CCP. CCP also operates the game EVE Online, which interacts with DUST 514 and is run using the same System.
To play DUST 514, CCP requires that you review and agree to the following terms and conditions of this End User License Agreement ("EULA").
**which contains nuggets such as**
CCP does not guarantee that it will continue to offer access to the System or support the Game. CCP may, in its sole discretion, cease to provide any or all of the services offered in connection with DUST 514 (including access to the System and any or all features or components of the Game)
Oh yea, but this isn't about whats legal and whats not, I keep forgetting. Let's see. CCP's desire for feedback on how this game is for the players, from the players , is something I imagined is it? Complaining IS feedback as requested! Haha, you attempt to appear relevant by quotoing EULAs here is fecking hilarious. Keep it up. Go on. Here's a hint. You're on the right track, but in the wrong place.
|
Oxskull Duncarino
Shadow Company HQ
248
|
Posted - 2013.11.24 01:37:00 -
[15] - Quote
Haha, I'll stick to what I said about ya before. Enjoy sitting there waiting to feel special. You deserve it. |
|
|
|