Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Baltazar Pontain
Phantom Universe Task Force Die Fremdenlegion
33
|
Posted - 2013.11.17 15:29:00 -
[1] - Quote
Here is an idea for EVE/Dust514 integration.
In Eve Online: * New Weapon: Bording Capsule. You can shoot with it at enemy ships. * Each shot can carry an amount of clones (for example 10). * Each bording capsule can be shoot before it hits the target.
* New Module: Defense Array. Each Defense Array holds an amount of clones (for example 25).
When a ship is hit by bording capsules an internal fight start on that ship and if intruder win it results in ship self destruct.
So what has this to do with Dust514?
=> A new game mode.
After the game starts the attacker have a certain amount of time (let's say 10 minutes).
To reach the core and "hack" it. The hacking procedure needs some time (for example 50 Seconds).
Attacking team has so much clones as bording capsules reached the invaded ship( for exampe 5 * 10) The defenders have basic clones + Defense Arrays (for example 25 + 2 * 25)
If attackers does not get it in the 10 minutes done, automatic decompression kicks in => failed.
Of course if no mercs are available EVE will handle that situation on its own.
Options: In fromt of a fight: Eve Corps can give Dust Corps exclusive rights to fight their matches.
Just an idea and not easy to program, but I think it would have potential do be awesome.
F(l)ight save!
|
Arkena Wyrnspire
Turalyon 514 Turalyon Alliance
5141
|
Posted - 2013.11.17 15:32:00 -
[2] - Quote
Such a brilliantly balanced suggestion. Bravo, OP, bravo. Capsuleers will surely recognise your brilliance.
Level 5 Forum Warrior
Lenin of the glorious armoured revolution
Supporter of CCP raRaRa.
|
Mobius Kaethis
Molon Labe PC RISE of LEGION
939
|
Posted - 2013.11.17 17:44:00 -
[3] - Quote
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:Such a brilliantly balanced suggestion. Bravo, OP, bravo. Capsuleers will surely recognise your brilliance.
Lol.
In the world of DUST/
The words are all in haiku/
Tweets are just too long
|
Hecarim Van Hohen
Project Serenity
251
|
Posted - 2013.11.17 18:10:00 -
[4] - Quote
Mobius Kaethis wrote:Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:Such a brilliantly balanced suggestion. Bravo, OP, bravo. Capsuleers will surely recognise your brilliance. Lol.
Lol indeed
D-í¦¦¦¦i-󦦦+¦¿¦ºv-ë-£i-ë¦ó¦¦d¦ò-Ǧíe¦¦-ë-í¦ò-ó ¦ò¦+-üw¦¿¦¦e-ü -ë¦òs¦¢¦+t-Ŧ+-£a¦¢-án-¥¦¢-ƒ¦¢d-ü-í-ó¦ó-ó ¦¦u-ÿ-󦦦+n-ÿ-í¦¦-ü-ëi¦ó-ó-Pt-Å-Åe¦º-Å-Çd-Å-ó -ü-ÿ-ü-íw¦¿-¥-£¦í-ëe¦¦-ÿ-ü -í-ü¦óf-ía¦¢¦+-P¦í-ól-ƒ¦ó
|
God Hates Lags
Red Star. EoN.
372
|
Posted - 2013.11.17 19:15:00 -
[5] - Quote
This will never happen with ships, but I do hope that eventually such a mechanism is used for targeting stations.
Doubles ISK
|
Valmar Shadereaver
The Exemplars Top Men.
34
|
Posted - 2013.11.17 20:06:00 -
[6] - Quote
even if theyd at this optoin it schuild not be self destruction of schip's otherwise eve capsulers wil complain there schips depend on dust player's make it a temporary debuf on a random stat either on defense/speed/damage/capregen
id prefer seeing fight's on station's or on cap schip's instead on the smaller schip's cause wat if they blow up the schip we are fighting on? i dont wanne get offed just cause they are impatient in the debuf so that we can haul ass of the schip before they rip it apart
we get kild multiple time's daily thats enof trauma being forced on is we dont need dieing in space as another one think of the poor clone's they need there sleep |
ADAM-OF-EVE
Svartur Bjorn
482
|
Posted - 2013.11.17 20:08:00 -
[7] - Quote
old news.. ccp already plan this. it was discussed at fanfest but it not something planned anytime for next few years
Ten soldiers wisely led will beat a hundred without a head
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=99075&find
|
Joel II X
AHPA
164
|
Posted - 2013.11.17 20:12:00 -
[8] - Quote
Valmar Shadereaver wrote:even if theyd at this optoin it schuild not be self destruction of schip's otherwise eve capsulers wil complain there schips depend on dust player's make it a temporary debuf on a random stat either on defense/speed/damage/capregen
id prefer seeing fight's on station's or on cap schip's instead on the smaller schip's cause wat if they blow up the schip we are fighting on? i dont wanne get offed just cause they are impatient in the debuf so that we can haul ass of the schip before they rip it apart
we get kild multiple time's daily thats enof trauma being forced on is we dont need dieing in space as another one think of the poor clone's they need there sleep I think I lost a couple of IQ points thanks to this post. |
zibathy numbertwo
Nox Aeterna Security
264
|
Posted - 2013.11.17 22:07:00 -
[9] - Quote
Everybody in this thread at OP.
Long Live Freedom; Long Live the Federation.
|
Baltazar Pontain
Phantom Universe Task Force Die Fremdenlegion
33
|
Posted - 2013.11.18 15:31:00 -
[10] - Quote
ADAM-OF-EVE wrote:ccp already plan this. it was discussed at fanfest but its not something planned anytime for next few years. even went into long debate about it with someone on the cpm while i was having my breakfast at the laundromat.
Nice to hear. And yes I am aware that this is nothing to expect in half a year.
I disagree that Eve Online pilots would rage. At least they would not rage if it would be made smart.
Such a feature is nothing that is pulled in some seconds. Some hours (and more!) of clear thinking is needed to paint the details. |
|
Arkena Wyrnspire
Turalyon 514 Turalyon Alliance
5219
|
Posted - 2013.11.18 18:09:00 -
[11] - Quote
Baltazar Pontain wrote:ADAM-OF-EVE wrote:ccp already plan this. it was discussed at fanfest but its not something planned anytime for next few years. even went into long debate about it with someone on the cpm while i was having my breakfast at the laundromat. Nice to hear. And yes I am aware that this is nothing to expect in half a year. I disagree that Eve Online pilots would rage. At least they would not rage if it would be made smart. Such a feature is nothing that is pulled in some seconds. Some hours (and more!) of clear thinking is needed to paint the details.
No, they would rage. What you are suggesting is something that EVE players cannot have a direct effect on yet directly affects them in a drastic way.
Level 5 Forum Warrior
Lenin of the glorious armoured revolution
Supporter of CCP raRaRa.
|
Jadu Wen
Xer Deadspace
179
|
Posted - 2013.11.18 18:09:00 -
[12] - Quote
Thank you for that....ow...my sides
GûÆGûêGûæGûæGûÆGûê GûÆGûêGûÇGûÇGûÇ GûÆGûêGûäGûæGûÆGûê
GûÆGûêGûÆGûêGûÆGûê GûÆGûêGûÇGûÇGûÇ GûÆGûêGûÆGûêGûÆGûê
GûÆGûêGûäGûÇGûäGûê GûÆGûêGûäGûäGûä GûÆGûêGûæGûæGûÇGûê ? SoonGäó
|
Baltazar Pontain
Phantom Universe Task Force Die Fremdenlegion
33
|
Posted - 2013.11.18 18:50:00 -
[13] - Quote
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:Baltazar Pontain wrote:ADAM-OF-EVE wrote:ccp already plan this. it was discussed at fanfest but its not something planned anytime for next few years. even went into long debate about it with someone on the cpm while i was having my breakfast at the laundromat. Nice to hear. And yes I am aware that this is nothing to expect in half a year. I disagree that Eve Online pilots would rage. At least they would not rage if it would be made smart. Such a feature is nothing that is pulled in some seconds. Some hours (and more!) of clear thinking is needed to paint the details. No, they would rage. What you are suggesting is something that EVE players cannot have a direct effect on yet directly affects them in a drastic way.
There is a lot a player has no direct influence. It is called "game mechanic".
And to counter that you can fit modules et cetera.
I think no player would rage if he is victim of ECM, or do you think different?
And the same would be if new elements would be inserted.
With modules, weapons, skills et cetera. Need to be balanced of course and like I said before nothing that is plain.
But well you have think out of the box for that. |
Shadow Archeus
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
147
|
Posted - 2013.11.18 20:18:00 -
[14] - Quote
Can we hijack ships........sell them off for isk......or they become part of the armada lol
Add internal defenses to ships.......automated defenses.....traps......or make it so the pilot can customize the interior of the ships for some custom maps |
Arkena Wyrnspire
Turalyon 514 Turalyon Alliance
5228
|
Posted - 2013.11.18 20:28:00 -
[15] - Quote
Baltazar Pontain wrote:Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:Baltazar Pontain wrote:ADAM-OF-EVE wrote:ccp already plan this. it was discussed at fanfest but its not something planned anytime for next few years. even went into long debate about it with someone on the cpm while i was having my breakfast at the laundromat. Nice to hear. And yes I am aware that this is nothing to expect in half a year. I disagree that Eve Online pilots would rage. At least they would not rage if it would be made smart. Such a feature is nothing that is pulled in some seconds. Some hours (and more!) of clear thinking is needed to paint the details. No, they would rage. What you are suggesting is something that EVE players cannot have a direct effect on yet directly affects them in a drastic way. There is a lot a player has no direct influence. It is called "game mechanic". And to counter that you can fit modules et cetera. I think no player would rage if he is victim of ECM, or do you think different? And the same would be if new elements would be inserted. With modules, weapons, skills et cetera. Need to be balanced of course and like I said before nothing that is plain. But well you have think out of the box for that.
EVE players rage enough about ECM, and actually there's quite a lot to be done about that compared to, say, being boarded by something that you personally can do nothing -at all- about, regardless of what is fit, what is done by the pilot, etc.
What you are suggesting has the potential to kill a titan, or if it's not applicable to capital ships a faction battleship, very easily, with no counter from the EVE side whatsoever. Warfare would turn into frigs popping up and firing boarding capsules at everything that moves.
Level 5 Forum Warrior
Lenin of the glorious armoured revolution
Supporter of CCP raRaRa.
|
MRBH1997
Knights Of Ender Public Disorder.
27
|
Posted - 2013.11.18 22:25:00 -
[16] - Quote
Though this will take time I could see a form of boarding with stations and titans. Titans included probably because they are basically like a mobile station. Still this is a good way of getting people to think of ways to make that work.
CEO of Knights of Ender, Pro Jack of All Traits
|
ADAM-OF-EVE
Svartur Bjorn
508
|
Posted - 2013.11.18 23:28:00 -
[17] - Quote
i discussed this at length with someone at fanfest a while back and we came to the conclusion that is would be best for structures and titan capture. you whittle something down to structure where it goes into a reinforced mode where eve can not kill it. instead they must fire clones into the ship where a battle then ensues to either capture or destroy it. the titan would already have a clone reserve onboard in a clone cargo bay or not if the player is feeling confident he wont get caught out.
defenders or attackers can choose to either capture of skuttle the structure or ship by controlling or destroying strategic points throughout the structure/ship. successful defending/capture of the ship repairs its jump capabilities and allows it to safely jump out or repairs the structure and places it into an extended reinforced mode. successful attack/skuttle puts the ship/structure into meltdown sealing its fait. it can be shot at to speed it along but no longer repairable.
now that would be fun
Ten soldiers wisely led will beat a hundred without a head
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=99075&find
|
Draco Cerberus
Hell's Gate Inc
512
|
Posted - 2013.11.18 23:52:00 -
[18] - Quote
googled bording, got this: "Did you mean: boarding?"
I like the suggestion of being able to "board" a ship by being launched from another ship and commented as such in a previous thread. This would be better served being somewhere on the Eve forums, get their take on it as well.
One Universe...with friendly fire and Open World Game Play for all!
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |