DUST Search - I think the Devs should go back to a 3 month update period.

Zekain K wrote:

This one month thing just seems like it is putting waaaaay too much pressure on them. Some of the people on this forum seem to think that there should new new content for each new update, even though an expectation like that unrealistically feasible for the size of the team that is working on this game. I do applaud the effort that have been trying put forth with this monthly update schedule, but I just do not think it is fair to them.

Sure, im ok with some balance tweaks here and there for urgent issues, and maybe a hotfix for random bugs (AS LONG AS THESE HOTFIXES AREN'T RELEASED NEAR THE WEEKEND) I wouldn't mind this at all as long as CCP maintains contact with the community, and does not leave us in the dark like what they have done in the past.

Give us pictures, videos, stats, and little blurbs on what is being worked on at any give time. Communication is the only thing I, and nearly everyone here wants. I personally feel that being left in the Dark for so long is one of the main reasons why I originally did not like the 3 month update schedule. But if that were to change, then I wouldn't mind it.

Pages: [1] :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Zekain K Expert Intervention Caldari State 474	Posted - 2013.11.14 04:56:00 - [1] - Quote This one month thing just seems like it is putting waaaaay too much pressure on them. Some of the people on this forum seem to think that there should new new content for each new update, even though an expectation like that unrealistically feasible for the size of the team that is working on this game. I do applaud the effort that have been trying put forth with this monthly update schedule, but I just do not think it is fair to them. Sure, im ok with some balance tweaks here and there for urgent issues, and maybe a hotfix for random bugs (AS LONG AS THESE HOTFIXES AREN'T RELEASED NEAR THE WEEKEND) I wouldn't mind this at all as long as CCP maintains contact with the community, and does not leave us in the dark like what they have done in the past. Give us pictures, videos, stats, and little blurbs on what is being worked on at any give time. Communication is the only thing I, and nearly everyone here wants.
Cosgar ParagonX 7750	Posted - 2013.11.14 05:06:00 - [2] - Quote Agreed. These rapid patches are nice, but it seems like they put too much focus on one thing at a time. I tried to put a level into Amarr Commando once, but got a server notification saying "Why?"
God Hates Lags Red Star. EoN. 358	Posted - 2013.11.14 05:08:00 - [3] - Quote IMO the one month update cycles are necessary for now until all the core mechanics are fixed and balance is implemented, as everything seems to be changing too hectically to wait three months for a patch every time hit detection improves and suddenly a new weapon is overpowered. Once the core mechanics are in place and CCP starts adding content I would be in favor of moving to a three month update cycle. Doubles ISK
THUNDERGROOVE ZionTCD Public Disorder. 1238	Posted - 2013.11.14 05:20:00 - [4] - Quote Why? So I can play for three weeks and stop until the next update that comes in 9 weeks? Or play for three weeks, take a one week break and come back the next update like I already do? The updates keep me coming back. ZionTCD Director PRO Amarr Sentinel \| ADV Amarr Logi \| ADV Minmatar Scout What is a signature?
Vitharr Foebane Blood Money Mercenaries 235	Posted - 2013.11.14 05:21:00 - [5] - Quote God Hates Lags wrote: IMO the one month update cycles are necessary for now until all the core mechanics are fixed and balance is implemented, as everything seems to be changing too hectically to wait three months for a patch every time hit detection improves and suddenly a new weapon is overpowered. Once the core mechanics are in place and CCP starts adding content I would be in favor of moving to a three month update cycle. Starting with the heavy laser How to make a Heavy Laser: 1.Take laser 2.Make it REALLY BIG 3.Give it to the heavy sobbing quietly in the corner.
Vell0cet Company of Marcher Lords Amarr Empire 539	Posted - 2013.11.14 05:22:00 - [6] - Quote I agree with @God Hates Lags. If there is a bug fix that's ready to go, I don't want to wait 2 more months for it to get pushed out. Many things can't be hot fixed and require changes to the client and a new download. For example, the annoying bug with the squad finder refreshing was fixed in 1.6. There's no reason for us to have to deal with that for 2 extra months just so it can be bundled in a big update. Also, they're working on more than just what is pushed out each month. CCP only pushes out fixes when they're ready. For example, the 2 new rifles have been in the works for many months. It's not like they started them after finnishing 1.6GÇª I expect things to slow down once we have all racial suits, the new rifles (and possibly the racial vehicles) in the game and balanced. Quick/Dirty Test Range Idea
Mikey Ducati Xer Cloud Consortium 52	Posted - 2013.11.14 05:23:00 - [7] - Quote No way.
Vrain Matari ZionTCD Public Disorder. 1221	Posted - 2013.11.14 05:26:00 - [8] - Quote God Hates Lags wrote: IMO the one month update cycles are necessary for now until all the core mechanics are fixed and balance is implemented, as everything seems to be changing too hectically to wait three months for a patch every time hit detection improves and suddenly a new weapon is overpowered. Once the core mechanics are in place and CCP starts adding content I would be in favor of moving to a three month update cycle. I agree with this, and we're probably only three patches away(1.7, 1.8, 1.9) from good core mechanics and full racial lineups for suits and weapons and maybe some of the vehicles. The thing that i will miss the most about monthly updates is the ability for us to course-correct quickly. I support SP rollover.
Aaroniero d'Lioncourt The Southern Legion The Umbra Combine 264	Posted - 2013.11.14 05:34:00 - [9] - Quote Zekain K wrote: This one month thing just seems like it is putting waaaaay too much pressure on them. Some of the people on this forum seem to think that there should new new content for each new update, even though an expectation like that unrealistically feasible for the size of the team that is working on this game. I do applaud the effort that have been trying put forth with this monthly update schedule, but I just do not think it is fair to them. Sure, im ok with some balance tweaks here and there for urgent issues, and maybe a hotfix for random bugs (AS LONG AS THESE HOTFIXES AREN'T RELEASED NEAR THE WEEKEND) I wouldn't mind this at all as long as CCP maintains contact with the community, and does not leave us in the dark like what they have done in the past. Give us pictures, videos, stats, and little blurbs on what is being worked on at any give time. Communication is the only thing I, and nearly everyone here wants. I personally feel that being left in the Dark for so long is one of the main reasons why I originally did not like the 3 month update schedule. But if that were to change, then I wouldn't mind it. What's more annoying to this is that no one told them to do updates on a monthly basis, they decided this, yet they can't deliver. hence Soon(tm), pushed back, etc etc excuses.
GET ATMESON Dem Durrty Boyz 168	Posted - 2013.11.14 06:08:00 - [10] - Quote Vitharr Foebane wrote: God Hates Lags wrote: IMO the one month update cycles are necessary for now until all the core mechanics are fixed and balance is implemented, as everything seems to be changing too hectically to wait three months for a patch every time hit detection improves and suddenly a new weapon is overpowered. Once the core mechanics are in place and CCP starts adding content I would be in favor of moving to a three month update cycle. Starting with the heavy laser Just have to say this. Love your signature. Im that heavy sobbing waiting for my gun. Good thing Dust514 is free. I would have returned it along time ago.

Iron Wolf Saber Den of Swords 10221	Posted - 2013.11.14 06:38:00 - [11] - Quote I am in disagreement. I mean they're already doing that in a sense already. But not sending out a patch full of fixes when they could is not being helpful. CPM 0 Secretary Omni-Soldier Specialist Current Theme \\= Advanced Scrambler Rifle =// Unlocked
Cosgar ParagonX 7752	Posted - 2013.11.14 06:56:00 - [12] - Quote Iron Wolf Saber wrote: I am in disagreement. I mean they're already doing that in a sense already. But not sending out a patch full of fixes when they could is not being helpful. This probably has something to do with $ony, right? I tried to put a level into Amarr Commando once, but got a server notification saying "Why?"
Reav Hannari Red Rock Outriders 1814	Posted - 2013.11.14 07:05:00 - [13] - Quote Monthly cycle simply delivers what is ready so we don't have to wait. Items that take longer will be shipped when ready, such as the vehicle overhaul. AKA: Rees Noturana https://twitter.com/reesnoturana
Racro 01 Arifistan 501st Knights of Leanbox 72	Posted - 2013.11.14 07:07:00 - [14] - Quote they should do with dust like they do on eve................... new expansion with every 6 months. with bug fixes and things in between.
Oswald Rehnquist 554	Posted - 2013.11.14 07:09:00 - [15] - Quote 1.5 and 1.6 just had optimization, 1.4 was small but did add new features, our 3 month schedule is still the same in essense plus it keeps me more engaged by look forward to the end of each month. I personally like it anyways, it keeps me playing dust vs other games. Below 28 dB


Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page