While a valid complaint you wont see any changes in behavior by ccp. You have to remember that ccp never intended to put corps into dust in the first place. The idea was that we were mercs and would work for eve corps. CCP changed course late in closed beta because of csm and player complaints. CCP agreed to give us corps but said it would be limited and cause restrictions. We accepted that moved on. CCP slowly added functionality to dust to support corps such as roles, tax, etc. That said there is still a lot of functionality that only eve players have with corps and alliances that dust doesn't, not to mention NO API. CCP also mentioned many times that since funcationality is available to dust via eve that because of limited resources that's good enough.

So add that all up and you will see ccp protect dust corps and players.

CCPs failure to get player feed back and ensuring a more effective build before release is not on the table. That would in the past and is no longer relevant.

The game is made, it is live, the mess is made. Now CCP need to clean it up and the posting clearly describes the situation and outlines general opportunities to fix it without telling them how to write their code. More players in EVE and DUST514 should weigh in if they want specifics fixed.

Our goal here is to prevent unfair protections for corps from the meta game because a leader happens to be in DUST and to bring clearly to the forefront the lack of parity between leaders roles in DUST514 and EVE so they realize it should be a priority as well.

You mean your goal is to use the fact that dust players cant see shares or share issuance to take over a corp. Your plan didn't work and now you are here to cry about it. Boo-fu*****-who

For the record ccp is listening to player feedback about stuff related to ACTUAL gameplay not eve nerds ability to jerk off over their meta game L33tness.

Your comments lack support and sophistication. CCP Devs and GMs are reading this and related posts and have commented in a few cases on them.

These corps which had interferance had several EVE players who were considered experienced and leaders. One of which was an alt of the CEO.

The Meta Game is actual game play, and it is a big part of DUST514 now... get used to it and expect it to expand.

This is small time and we know much larger groups plan much bigger scams than we can pull off and in a big way.

Even bigger meta games are coming. Just wait for the first few rounds of economic warfare to start and how much it is going to cost DUST514 mercs when the mechanic makes it possible.

(lots of blablabla)

Dear RAider (sic),

You are failing to understand that, at least for now, Dust514 and EVE Online are 2 separate games, even if they share backend components.
This sharing of backends are causing some "opportunities" (corps, orbitals etc), but due to how the games are separate in design and goals, part of that backend is a hindrance (EVE Shares, director-roles et al), and CCP have decided, at least for now, to insulate Dust514 from it.
This insulation is partly due to lack of implementation, and partly by design, and they are following through on this such that they are taking manual steps to uphold it. They are not doing this because it is fun for them, but because this is where the system is at this point,, and they have to ensure a viable system.

The faster you accept this, the happier you will be, and who knows....perhaps CCP will eventually extend the Corporation functions on the Dust, at which point they will likely let you run wild with hostile take-overs and whatnut.

I am fairly certain I am up to speed and understand fully the implications. To say the games are separate would be far from correct and a complete fallacy. They share far more than back-ends and which should be understood by most of the power players. Those with less vision may not catch it right away, if ever.

Social groups exist across the platforms and do so currently and definitely work together. Those social groups which cross both gaming platforms and do so very well are inherently in a much better place than those which are not.

The platforms are different but are no longer truly separate games when one game can impact the other and vice versa, which they do across social, political, economic, and other lines. The ability to impact along those lines are mechanics and levers which can be worked to achieve strategic or operational advantage.

Looking at this from a purely tactical view and not also examining what is already happening at the operational and strategic levels will cause this system to break if parity is not created quickly.

We have known about this for over a year that dust was not getting share visibility or functionality. So why are you crying about it now? I tried to explain that when ccp added dust corps they piggy backed eve functionality. CCP has no intentions and sees no game play value from a dust perspective to include shares functionality. It's not going to change because you are throwing a temper tantrum over it either.

like I said save some face and let it go.

I will be ignoring Free Beer's further attempts as a pontificating forum sniper.

For clarity, I am not the one having a tantrum... the corps getting burned by me and my buddies are. We just want to give them every opportunity to have equality and vice versa.