|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
M McManus
Sinq Laison Gendarmes
Gallente Federation
193
   |
Posted - 2013.11.03 16:26:00 -
[1] - Quote
For not responding to a percentage of your player base, well done...
Multiple Devs respond to posts on the daily with half ass troll-ácomments-áand we can't even get acknowledgment on our issue that we have been fighting for going on 6months now...
I'm done you can have this cookie cutter lobby shooter full of broken promises...
|
M McManus
Sinq Laison Gendarmes
Gallente Federation
193
|
Posted - 2013.11.03 16:30:00 -
[2] - Quote
Harpyja wrote:Can I has your ISK?
Edit: Wooo first!
Yep ill send it this evening I have about 50k isk on this toon.. ;) |
M McManus
Sinq Laison Gendarmes
Gallente Federation
193
|
Posted - 2013.11.03 16:44:00 -
[3] - Quote
Paran Tadec wrote:M McManus wrote:For not responding to a percentage of your player base, well done... Multiple Devs respond to posts on the daily with half ass troll-ácomments-áand we can't even get acknowledgment on our issue that we have been fighting for going on 6months now... I'm done you can have this cookie cutter lobby shooter full of broken promises... The main problem is lack of responses to good threads, while troll threads get troll responses.
Couldn't agree more it's not JUST the kb/m issue that did it for me Its the only issue that hits close to home. .
I can deal with..
Omni tanking bullshit
AR 514
Forge gun tower snipers
Logi Slayers
Worthless shield tanking
Armor tanking OP
PC lag (this maybe not so much)
As long as I can aim im fine "dealing" with the above...
CCP promised kb/m support and to continually screw it over and at the same time completely ignoring that part of the player base is the lowest form of customer support and community relations ive ever seen.. Don't promise an input then mirror the input with the pre-1.4 DS3 mechanics then revamp DS3 with auto aim... |
M McManus
Sinq Laison Gendarmes
Gallente Federation
194
|
Posted - 2013.11.03 17:35:00 -
[4] - Quote
steadyhand amarr wrote:over entitled player alert, warning warning over entitled player alert
Yep makes sense im glad you're so knowledgeable on the subject ...
An entire 8 page thread of over entitled players go figure :( .. To think if only the majority that is controller users flooded these forums with post after post about how they can't aim in CQC... Oh wait they did pre 1.4 that's why you "entitled" were given aim assist via 1.4...
A for effort though.. |
M McManus
Sinq Laison Gendarmes
Gallente Federation
199
|
Posted - 2013.11.03 18:17:00 -
[5] - Quote
TheAmazing FlyingPig wrote:I adapted to the DS3. Maybe you should too.
Sure thing if CCP replys and says kb/m is staying this way or they are going to remove it completely. Then sure ill adapt to the controller on the 15th when killzone 4 comes out and never look back at this POS..
I know some of the kb/m users who are EVE fabs or veteran EVE players came to Dust and even purchased a PS3 just because of kb/m support why should we use controller when kb/m was promised from the beginning ? |
M McManus
Sinq Laison Gendarmes
Gallente Federation
199
|
Posted - 2013.11.03 18:38:00 -
[6] - Quote
Thor McStrut wrote:Paran Tadec wrote:M McManus wrote:For not responding to a percentage of your player base, well done... Multiple Devs respond to posts on the daily with half ass troll-ácomments-áand we can't even get acknowledgment on our issue that we have been fighting for going on 6months now... I'm done you can have this cookie cutter lobby shooter full of broken promises... The main problem is lack of responses to good threads, while troll threads get troll responses. I think the issue here is trolling can be done without oversight. But answering legit questions with legit answers requires approval. Even if they have an opinion on the subject, they can't say anything they can't promise. So you often get answers like, Soon, I'll ask someone, We're looking into it, blah blah.
I totally understand this, its the fact that kb/m concern threads come and go with no response, not even a simple "we hear you guys and are looking into it" |
|
|
| |
|