DUST Search - Oh would you look at that?

All Channels

General Discussions

Oh would you look at that?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 :: [one page]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Coleman Gray GunFall Mobilization Covert Intervention 857	Posted - 2013.10.25 06:41:00 - [1] - Quote CCP are balancing AV, almost makes me wanna stick with vehicles.
Iron Wolf Saber Den of Swords 9649	Posted - 2013.10.25 06:43:00 - [2] - Quote Coleman Gray wrote: CCP are balancing AV, almost makes me wanna stick with vehicles. You still have to compare it the vehicle numbers put out. Not the current story as is.
Evolution-8 Brutor Vanguard Minmatar Republic 43	Posted - 2013.10.25 06:45:00 - [3] - Quote Did you know that men are 5 times more likely to be struck by lightning than a woman according to the CDC You are now enlightened.
DUST Fiend OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention 7233	Posted - 2013.10.25 06:47:00 - [4] - Quote Evolution-8 wrote: Did you know that men are 5 times more likely to be struck by lightning than a woman according to the CDC You are now enlightened. I actually had a great great something or another uncle Harlow, I saw his tombstone, he was struck by lightning lmao.
Jason Pearson Animus Securities 3047	Posted - 2013.10.25 06:49:00 - [5] - Quote Don't worry, CCP will destroy vehicles, give it time. King of the Forums // Vehicle Specialist for Hire Comment and like this thread about PvE, Here! Also, check out the Indirect Fire ability, Here!
Cosgar ParagonX 6457	Posted - 2013.10.25 06:53:00 - [6] - Quote CCP Wolfman for president!
medomai grey WarRavens League of Infamy 285	Posted - 2013.10.25 07:32:00 - [7] - Quote Coleman Gray wrote: CCP are balancing AV, almost makes me wanna stick with vehicles. You thought they wouldn't after they told you they would?
Coleman Gray GunFall Mobilization Covert Intervention 859	Posted - 2013.10.25 18:08:00 - [8] - Quote medomai grey wrote: Coleman Gray wrote: CCP are balancing AV, almost makes me wanna stick with vehicles. You thought they wouldn't after they told you they would? of cause I didn't, CCP has promised us much but given. Like how Jesus promised an end to all suffering. I still hear about starving children in the world. At least Odin promised an end to Frost Giants, and just saying I havn't seen a Frost Giant in awhile.
BARDAS DUST University Ivy League 729	Posted - 2013.10.25 18:10:00 - [9] - Quote If by balancing your mean cutting its balls off sure. Yes, they needed to be tweaked by wow they may just as well have removed them from the game for about as effective they are going to be. Calling it now the days of tanks going 50-0 is returning.
Takahiro Kashuken Red Star. EoN. 1516	Posted - 2013.10.25 18:12:00 - [10] - Quote The tears are just rolling in today Its glorious

Coleman Gray GunFall Mobilization Covert Intervention 859	Posted - 2013.10.25 18:17:00 - [11] - Quote BARDAS wrote: If by balancing your mean cutting its balls off sure. Yes, they needed to be tweaked by wow they may just as well have removed them from the game for about as effective they are going to be. Calling it now the days of tanks going 50-0 is returning. The range nerf is holding the nerf hammer with both hands, but the damage nerf was needed.
Beck Weathers Ghosts of Dawn 176	Posted - 2013.10.25 18:19:00 - [12] - Quote Flux granades anrt likely to be touched so shield tanks will still be lol easy to kill with a breach MD and flux nades
CharCharOdell Shining Flame Amarr Empire 1285	Posted - 2013.10.25 18:24:00 - [13] - Quote Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Coleman Gray wrote: CCP are balancing AV, almost makes me wanna stick with vehicles. You still have to compare it the vehicle numbers put out. Not the current story as is. Already did that and vehicles will be very balanced against AV in my tanker opinion
CharCharOdell Shining Flame Amarr Empire 1285	Posted - 2013.10.25 18:26:00 - [14] - Quote BARDAS wrote: If by balancing your mean cutting its balls off sure. Yes, they needed to be tweaked by wow they may just as well have removed them from the game for about as effective they are going to be. Calling it now the days of tanks going 50-0 is returning. Snipers do it. Forges do it. Mass drivers and ARs do it. Why can't a tanker? Even in chrome only 10 tankers in the game could pull games like that. My best was 54:0
Gunmouse 0uter.Heaven 82	Posted - 2013.10.25 18:26:00 - [15] - Quote Oh would you look at that
CharCharOdell Shining Flame Amarr Empire 1285	Posted - 2013.10.25 18:27:00 - [16] - Quote Coleman Gray wrote: CCP are balancing AV, almost makes me wanna stick with vehicles. About 15,000,000 SP to get a maxed out tank with one turret.
Atiim Living Like Larry Schwag 358	Posted - 2013.10.25 18:31:00 - [17] - Quote Takahiro Kashuken wrote: The tears are just rolling in today Its glorious Yeah, I still have gallons of your tears from when you were QQing about how AV should be nerfed (which is wrong) Wanna sip?
Quil Evrything DUST University Ivy League 287	Posted - 2013.10.25 18:33:00 - [18] - Quote Coleman Gray wrote: CCP are balancing AV, almost makes me wanna stick with vehicles. When I can throw wave after wave of missiles from an ADV swarm at a tank, and it looks like it has taken NO damage... the only "balancing" that seems needed, is to make tanks MORE vulnerable to AV, not less :p
Gunmouse 0uter.Heaven 82	Posted - 2013.10.25 18:36:00 - [19] - Quote Atiim wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: The tears are just rolling in today Its glorious Yeah, I still have gallons of your tears from when you were QQing about how AV should be nerfed (which is wrong) Wanna sip? Gotta say I remember this guy as well. He was on the forefront of QQ when it came to AV. you could buff that dudes tank 500%, it still isn't going to help him win a PC match against anyone but no names.
Tebu Gan Dem Durrty Boyz Public Disorder. 178	Posted - 2013.10.25 18:51:00 - [20] - Quote Gezz people, has not a one of you AV people looked at the changes to tanks?? Really go look. Go look I just can't figure out why AV is up in arms, It's almost like they have only heard about an AV nerf. Must have missed the Tank nerf! (or total restructuring I should say)

Goric Rumis Dead Six Initiative Lokun Listamenn 238	Posted - 2013.10.25 19:29:00 - [21] - Quote Hopefully they will tweak down the damage on the Assault Forge but leave forges mostly the same. This will allow them to push back against godmoding vehicles a bit when it's critical to protect an area. Then the swarms (with their extra mobility) will focus on finding and ambushing vehicles during cooldown. I think it could actually work out pretty well.
Coleman Gray GunFall Mobilization Covert Intervention 862	Posted - 2013.10.25 19:33:00 - [22] - Quote Goric Rumis wrote: Hopefully they will tweak down the damage on the Assault Forge but leave forges mostly the same. This will allow them to push back against godmoding vehicles a bit when it's critical to protect an area. Then the swarms (with their extra mobility) will focus on finding and ambushing vehicles during cooldown. I think it could actually work out pretty well. I see the damage being toned down to match the PC's damage, but even as a tanker I hope they don't touch the FG too much, Heavies have little as it is.
Slag Emberforge Immortal Retribution 87	Posted - 2013.10.25 20:06:00 - [23] - Quote Hey maybe without all of the lolswarmers ill actually get some infantry protection. When I have boots on flat terrain with my assault FG. Oh right--- that requires team work.... no probably not.
Spkr4theDead Red Star. EoN. 1115	Posted - 2013.10.26 06:35:00 - [24] - Quote Atiim wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: The tears are just rolling in today Its glorious Yeah, I still have gallons of your tears from when you were QQing about how AV should be nerfed (which is wrong) Wanna sip? Reference my multiple posts to you about how you're lying about being a tanker, and that if you were telling the truth, you wouldn't be on a crusade against tanks.
Spkr4theDead Red Star. EoN. 1115	Posted - 2013.10.26 06:36:00 - [25] - Quote Quil Evrything wrote: Coleman Gray wrote: CCP are balancing AV, almost makes me wanna stick with vehicles. When I can throw wave after wave of missiles from an ADV swarm at a tank, and it looks like it has taken NO damage... the only "balancing" that seems needed, is to make tanks MORE vulnerable to AV, not less :p Sounds like you're locking and firing when the tank is actually outside the terminal range of swarms. Which implies you go to no-man's land on any map, and start spamming EZ-Mode swarms at all vehicles, as if it's a hard thing to do.
Takahiro Kashuken Red Star. EoN. 1524	Posted - 2013.10.26 12:04:00 - [26] - Quote Gunmouse wrote: Atiim wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: The tears are just rolling in today Its glorious Yeah, I still have gallons of your tears from when you were QQing about how AV should be nerfed (which is wrong) Wanna sip? Gotta say I remember this guy as well. He was on the forefront of QQ when it came to AV. you could buff that dudes tank 500%, it still isn't going to help him win a PC match against anyone but no names. Sorry that OH uses no name tankers Then again you can always put a proto FG up on a tower like a 1 trick pony to stop me from raping you with a basic tank
Toyboi The Rainbow Effect 145	Posted - 2013.10.26 12:07:00 - [27] - Quote Cosgar wrote: CCP Wolfman for president! yeah president for syria! they wouldent have any weapons then! problems solved ps. the syrian army would also lose the abillety to aim!


Pages: 1 :: [one page]

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.