Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Caeli SineDeo
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
704
 |
Posted - 2013.10.21 15:01:00 -
[1] - Quote
I do not want to spend a hour to hours creating feedback just to find it is not being looked at. I have not seen a single dev response past the ones in the first few days.
I see some issues that need to be addressed and fixed before 1.6 is released. Otherwise tanking will not be as fun as you guys think its going to be. I will be addressing why armor might be the powerhouse of tanking still. |

CHICAGOCUBS4EVER
MoIden Heath PoIice Department EoN.
2067
 |
Posted - 2013.10.21 15:30:00 -
[2] - Quote
Caeli SineDeo wrote:I do not want to spend a hour to hours creating feedback just to find it is not being looked at. I have not seen a single dev response past the ones in the first few days.
I see some issues that need to be addressed and fixed before 1.6 is released. Otherwise tanking will not be as fun as you guys think its going to be. I will be addressing why armor might be the powerhouse of tanking still.
short answer?
nope...
but please continue with the constructive well-thought feedback that may or may not be falling upon def ears...
its kinda like determining how many licks it takes to get to the center of a Toostie Pop.
the world may never know....  |

Takahiro Kashuken
Red Star. EoN.
1487
 |
Posted - 2013.10.21 15:42:00 -
[3] - Quote
Infantry514
For some reason the groundpounders seem to have more say than the pilots who use the vehicles so naturally CCP listens to them and puts in bad ideas and mechanisms which screws us even more
I dunno why they even bothered with a feedback thread since they havnt looked at it |

Caeli SineDeo
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
705
 |
Posted - 2013.10.21 15:42:00 -
[4] - Quote
CHICAGOCUBS4EVER wrote:Caeli SineDeo wrote:I do not want to spend a hour to hours creating feedback just to find it is not being looked at. I have not seen a single dev response past the ones in the first few days.
I see some issues that need to be addressed and fixed before 1.6 is released. Otherwise tanking will not be as fun as you guys think its going to be. I will be addressing why armor might be the powerhouse of tanking still. short answer? nope... but please continue with the constructive well-thought feedback that may or may not be falling upon def ears... its kinda like determining how many licks it takes to get to the center of a Toostie Pop. the world may never know....  Exactly why when they give all my SP back that I put into vehicle skills I will put it strait into Winitar Logi suit with lol swarms and good old trusty assault rifle with armor tank and damage mods. :) |

CHICAGOCUBS4EVER
MoIden Heath PoIice Department EoN.
2069
 |
Posted - 2013.10.21 15:49:00 -
[5] - Quote
Caeli SineDeo wrote:CHICAGOCUBS4EVER wrote:Caeli SineDeo wrote:I do not want to spend a hour to hours creating feedback just to find it is not being looked at. I have not seen a single dev response past the ones in the first few days.
I see some issues that need to be addressed and fixed before 1.6 is released. Otherwise tanking will not be as fun as you guys think its going to be. I will be addressing why armor might be the powerhouse of tanking still. short answer? nope... but please continue with the constructive well-thought feedback that may or may not be falling upon def ears... its kinda like determining how many licks it takes to get to the center of a Toostie Pop. the world may never know....  Exactly why when they give all my SP back that I put into vehicle skills I will put it strait into Winitar Logi suit with lol swarms and good old trusty assault rifle with armor tank and damage mods. :)
but...but... that would require you to log on the game...  |

JL3Eleven
PFB Pink Fluffy Bunnies
1090
 |
Posted - 2013.10.21 15:55:00 -
[6] - Quote
I must say the IMPS always had the best feedback that was never listened too.    |

KenKaniff69
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
739
 |
Posted - 2013.10.21 16:05:00 -
[7] - Quote
Clearly not. As Noc mentioned before, we should have seen part 3 by now since they have 30 pages of constructive feedback to go through. The whole WIP excuse I am seeing thrown around is nothing but BS. To be honest, they are way over their heads and they are probably going to delay these changes another one or two updates-ATLEAST.  |

Bendtner92
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
1169
 |
Posted - 2013.10.21 16:26:00 -
[8] - Quote
Probably not.
Then again, last I heard they were still trying to figure out AV changes. |

Caeli SineDeo
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
706
 |
Posted - 2013.10.21 19:06:00 -
[9] - Quote
CHICAGOCUBS4EVER wrote:Caeli SineDeo wrote:CHICAGOCUBS4EVER wrote:Caeli SineDeo wrote:I do not want to spend a hour to hours creating feedback just to find it is not being looked at. I have not seen a single dev response past the ones in the first few days.
I see some issues that need to be addressed and fixed before 1.6 is released. Otherwise tanking will not be as fun as you guys think its going to be. I will be addressing why armor might be the powerhouse of tanking still. short answer? nope... but please continue with the constructive well-thought feedback that may or may not be falling upon def ears... its kinda like determining how many licks it takes to get to the center of a Toostie Pop. the world may never know....  Exactly why when they give all my SP back that I put into vehicle skills I will put it strait into Winitar Logi suit with lol swarms and good old trusty assault rifle with armor tank and damage mods. :) but...but... that would require you to log on the game...  That would require you to delcare war on STB for enslaving their people on Reg's toliet. Or whatever else made up reason you want to create for attacking them. :)
|

CHICAGOCUBS4EVER
MoIden Heath PoIice Department EoN.
2071
 |
Posted - 2013.10.21 19:35:00 -
[10] - Quote
touche' |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |