Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Beld Errmon
Evocatius
928
|
Posted - 2013.10.02 02:59:00 -
[1] - Quote
Take the 2 turrets from the side of the vehicle and lock them facing forward allow them to fire in sync with the main gun, this would offset the high cost and low survivability of what is otherwise an awesome aircraft. |
Mossellia Delt
Militaires Sans Jeux
473
|
Posted - 2013.10.02 04:37:00 -
[2] - Quote
no thanks, as an assault DS pilot I would not like this. If you want to bump our survivability give us more HP |
Lynn Beck
Granite Mercenary Division
136
|
Posted - 2013.10.02 08:04:00 -
[3] - Quote
+1 to second post. I wouod prefer a universal 40% hp buff to havs and dropships. Just as long as AV doesn't get a mandatory 80% buff in dps, or even an unneeded 100% dps buff (as per swarm launcher) on a weapon that is already OP against vehicles. |
Vyzion Eyri
The Southern Legion The Umbra Combine
1371
|
Posted - 2013.10.02 09:53:00 -
[4] - Quote
Bigger maps > HP buff. If there is a mountain range between A and B, then dropships become useful and won't die easily at all. |
shaman oga
Nexus Balusa Horizon DARKSTAR ARMY
744
|
Posted - 2013.10.02 11:03:00 -
[5] - Quote
I would like more PG, i need to fit an heavy shield extender on my phyton to make some use of the bonus on shield resistance modules. |
Beld Errmon
Evocatius
929
|
Posted - 2013.10.02 14:14:00 -
[6] - Quote
how the F can you not like the idea of more guns to use?
Im thinking you lot have such a terrible time using the 1 turret that the idea of 2 more scares you. |
Mossellia Delt
Militaires Sans Jeux
475
|
Posted - 2013.10.02 15:36:00 -
[7] - Quote
Beld Errmon wrote:how the F can you not like the idea of more guns to use?
Im thinking you lot have such a terrible time using the 1 turret that the idea of 2 more scares you.
The fact that I can two shot any infantry with my main gun and have little problem killing STD and enforcer tanks and that i'll be removing my side guns once able to means I'd rather have more EHP then damage buff. |
Beld Errmon
Evocatius
931
|
Posted - 2013.10.03 01:15:00 -
[8] - Quote
Well forget it fellas cause we aren't getting any improvements to the ADS they are taking the things out "temporally" which means like the Sagaris and Surya we won't be flying these things again for months, a seriously re-tarded move by CCP taking the only useful dropships out of the game altogether. |
lithkul devant
Legions of Infinite Dominion
91
|
Posted - 2013.10.03 02:06:00 -
[9] - Quote
Lynn Beck wrote:+1 to second post. I wouod prefer a universal 40% hp buff to havs and dropships. Just as long as AV doesn't get a mandatory 80% buff in dps, or even an unneeded 100% dps buff (as per swarm launcher) on a weapon that is already OP against vehicles.
You do realize that you are driving a "standard" assault dropship, not an advanced or proto, yeah AV might be a bit strong right now, but if you got into a proto assault dropship that AV would be pathetically weak compared to you if dropsuit scaling is anything similar to what vehicle scaling might be like. In an HAV that is proto you might well have over 14k of health and 30-40% passive armor or shield damage reduction. We are just seeing the very bare tip of what vehicles can be like within Dust and some of those HAV tanks can decimate an entire team or least hold their own for a very long time.
For Dropship pilots as it is, you can take multiple swarm missile volleys and survive, you have good dps, and if you feel that swarm launchers are being a problem just put on your booster and you'll out run the swarm missiles easily or just fly straight up and put on your repairers and your back good as new. The only thing that really even bothers the ADS is the forge gunner or the turrets that sometimes get to many good hits.
So I'm not exactly understanding your complaints, unless you are saying that vehicles are currently way to expensive, then I agree with you whole heartidly. However, for the other parts I have to say no, I don't say this out of malice, but out of we don't know how powerful the advanced and proto ships and HAVs or even LAVs will be. Until we have some rough estimate of what they could be like I could only go for around a 15-20% increase in vehicle hps and that is honestly pushing it some. Also, vehicles will be getting retuned hopefully for the better between the next 3 patches. |
Beld Errmon
Evocatius
940
|
Posted - 2013.10.03 02:11:00 -
[10] - Quote
Why are you wasting your breathe? GONE when the vehicle patch hits all arguements for improvement null and void, won't see this vehicle again for months. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |