| Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Sotapopthegrey gay
Storm Wind Strikeforce
Caldari State
140
   |
Posted - 2013.09.18 16:10:00 -
[1] - Quote
C+šp the maps feel to big for the player count within skirmmy.
Skirmish feels like a running game, but with out the refreshments...
The game mode needs about 25% to 35% decrease, unless your going to up the player count soon? I think your look at another 15 on each just to make it epic...
Ambush feels empty and needs to be redesigned without the 5k maps in mind. Unless your going to fill the ambush maps with more objects, or just play with the terrain in a way that blocks line sight more.
Some of the new dom maps are ok...
I'm getting bored and really need a rush mode, but not a rush mode that's a lot of old skirmish map tied together.
On my phone sorry about the great spelling. |
Rogue Saint
Science For Death
The Shadow Eclipse
195
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 16:15:00 -
[2] - Quote
No, the map size is fine, great for cars/tanks, great for small battles on the outside points. We want big maps. |
Maken Tosch
DUST University
Ivy League
4217
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 16:16:00 -
[3] - Quote
If you think the maps are too big, wait until a year or two from now. |
Sinboto Simmons
SVER True Blood
Public Disorder.
1233
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 16:18:00 -
[4] - Quote
The maps seem to be made for 32V32 matches (or more) and armor mobility.
Problem: Don't have 32V32 matches (or more) and armor is scared shitless by AV |
Bendtner92
Imperfects
Negative-Feedback
1079
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 16:22:00 -
[5] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:If you think the maps are too big, wait until a year or two from now.
He's not saying the maps are too big though, just that they don't really suit 32 player battles.
The current maps are better suited for 48 or 64 player battles. |
Sotapopthegrey gay
Storm Wind Strikeforce
Caldari State
140
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 16:29:00 -
[6] - Quote
Bendtner92 wrote:Maken Tosch wrote:If you think the maps are too big, wait until a year or two from now. He's not saying the maps are too big though, just that they don't really suit 32 player battles. The current maps are better suited for 48 or 64 player battles.
That's what i'm saying. |
Quil Evrything
DUST University
Ivy League
141
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 16:42:00 -
[7] - Quote
Bendtner92 wrote:Maken Tosch wrote:If you think the maps are too big, wait until a year or two from now. He's not saying the maps are too big though, just that they don't really suit 32 player battles. The current maps are better suited for 48 or 64 player battles.
No way. they are GREAT for 32 player battles. LAVs are actually useful now strategicly, rather than just as murder taxis.
The above people are whining just because they never bothered to put anything into vehicles, I would guess.
They're also not so bad if you have skilled into scout, rather than just heavy, or medium+++ARMOR.
|
Bendtner92
Imperfects
Negative-Feedback
1079
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 16:47:00 -
[8] - Quote
Quil Evrything wrote:No way. they are GREAT for 32 player battles. LAVs are actually useful now strategicly, rather than just as murder taxis.
The above people are whining just because they never bothered to put anything into vehicles, I would guess.
They're also not so bad if you have skilled into scout, rather than just heavy, or medium+++ARMOR.
Nice try.
More players in battle means more people need a ride. |
Quil Evrything
DUST University
Ivy League
141
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 16:48:00 -
[9] - Quote
Bendtner92 wrote:Quil Evrything wrote:No way. they are GREAT for 32 player battles. LAVs are actually useful now strategicly, rather than just as murder taxis.
The above people are whining just because they never bothered to put anything into vehicles, I would guess.
They're also not so bad if you have skilled into scout, rather than just heavy, or medium+++ARMOR. Nice try. More players in battle means more people need a ride.
What's your point?
|
Sotapopthegrey gay
Storm Wind Strikeforce
Caldari State
140
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 17:07:00 -
[10] - Quote
Quil Evrything wrote:Bendtner92 wrote:Maken Tosch wrote:If you think the maps are too big, wait until a year or two from now. He's not saying the maps are too big though, just that they don't really suit 32 player battles. The current maps are better suited for 48 or 64 player battles. No way. they are GREAT for 32 player battles. LAVs are actually useful now strategicly, rather than just as murder taxis. The above people are whining just because they never bothered to put anything into vehicles, I would guess. They're also not so bad if you have skilled into scout, rather than just heavy, or medium+++ARMOR.
I'm not crying, just skirmish feels non productive in fire fights.
Also some of the objectives take to long even if you get a lav( calling it down from the sky)
|
|
|
Sotapopthegrey gay
Storm Wind Strikeforce
Caldari State
140
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 17:09:00 -
[11] - Quote
Quil Evrything wrote:Bendtner92 wrote:Quil Evrything wrote:No way. they are GREAT for 32 player battles. LAVs are actually useful now strategicly, rather than just as murder taxis.
The above people are whining just because they never bothered to put anything into vehicles, I would guess.
They're also not so bad if you have skilled into scout, rather than just heavy, or medium+++ARMOR. Nice try. More players in battle means more people need a ride. What's your point?
That the maps feel like 30 vs 30, not 16... |
lordjanuz
Norwegian Dust514 Corporation
Top Men.
182
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 18:03:00 -
[12] - Quote
Still to small, we need them bigger , much bigger. |
GTA V FTW
Kang Lo Directorate
Gallente Federation
73
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 18:06:00 -
[13] - Quote
I find that with the combination of these new maps and the fact that winning or losing has no real meaning it is encouraging camping more than before.
Nothing wrong with this, just something I have noticed is all. |
Joey-Number1
Maniacal Miners INC
No Safe Haven
58
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 18:14:00 -
[14] - Quote
Rogue Saint wrote:No, the map size is fine, great for cars/tanks, great for small battles on the outside points. We want big maps.
Exactly |
Sotapopthegrey gay
Storm Wind Strikeforce
Caldari State
140
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 23:02:00 -
[15] - Quote
Joey-Number1 wrote:Rogue Saint wrote:No, the map size is fine, great for cars/tanks, great for small battles on the outside points. We want big maps. Exactly
32 player match on a even bigger, where's the logic? |
KING CHECKMATE
TEAM SATISFACTION
1168
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 23:23:00 -
[16] - Quote
Rogue Saint wrote:No, the map size is fine, great for cars/tanks, great for small battles on the outside points. We want big maps.
NO, Vehicle USERS and snipers want big maps.
f*** that.
MAPS ARE to big for the low amount of players that get in a game.... |
Quil Evrything
DUST University
Ivy League
150
|
Posted - 2013.09.20 00:42:00 -
[17] - Quote
GTA V FTW wrote:I find that with the combination of these new maps and the fact that winning or losing has no real meaning it is encouraging camping more than before.
Nothing wrong with this, just something I have noticed is all.
Camping what?
Camping spawn points, or camping objectives?
Camping objectives, is what's *supposed* to happen. Capture an objective, and protect it. Strategy.
Camping spawn points?
So create more uplinks. Again, strategy. Its supposed to be a feature of Dust?
If the enemy successfully camps all but your original MCCspawnpoint.. that means they are EXECUTING GOOD STRATEGY.
If you cant combat that, then they deserve to win and you deserve to lose.
|
Master Jaraiya
Ultramarine Corp
808
|
Posted - 2013.09.20 01:17:00 -
[18] - Quote
Quil Evrything wrote:GTA V FTW wrote:I find that with the combination of these new maps and the fact that winning or losing has no real meaning it is encouraging camping more than before.
Nothing wrong with this, just something I have noticed is all. Camping what? Camping spawn points, or camping objectives? Camping objectives, is what's *supposed* to happen. Capture an objective, and protect it. Strategy. Camping spawn points? So create more uplinks. Again, strategy. Its supposed to be a feature of Dust? If the enemy successfully camps all but your original MCCspawnpoint.. that means they are EXECUTING GOOD STRATEGY. If you cant combat that, then they deserve to win and you deserve to lose.
I like the new maps. I think they are near perfect in size. Any smaller encourages zerging, which I hate. Any larger and the battles would be too slow in their progression.
Currently the battles usually consist of several different firefights at different installations or objectives occuring simultaneously throughout the match. I think this is what the game is meant to be. Some of the maps are big enough for a few more players. I wouldn't go more than 24 v 24 on them, otherwise you will see more zerging, which I hate! |
Vell0cet
Royal Uhlans
Amarr Empire
256
|
Posted - 2013.09.20 03:17:00 -
[19] - Quote
The bigger the map the more strategic the fight. |
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |