| Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
ANON Illuminati
A.N.O.N.Y.M.O.U.S.
225
   |
Posted - 2013.09.06 10:08:00 -
[1] - Quote
its just a game.
CCP any idea when u will add a 32 v 32 tho? new maps are huge and would be more exciting if there were more ppl to shoot at. especially if it was 32 v 32 corp fw matches. just saying its a great idea and i dont think people who play together as a unified and structured team would disagree.
give us what we want and what will make this game more entertaining also give us some kind of personal turrets or something like the squid looking robots you had in one video i think this will be awsome to use in huge maps w 32 players.
or atleast 24 v 24. ill be greatfull i promise i wont ask for anything else. |
ChromeBreaker
SVER True Blood
Public Disorder.
1123
|
Posted - 2013.09.06 10:10:00 -
[2] - Quote
MOAR TARGETS!!! |
ANON Illuminati
A.N.O.N.Y.M.O.U.S.
225
|
Posted - 2013.09.06 10:11:00 -
[3] - Quote
also please make it so we can either shoot from the passenger side of the lav's with our secondary weapon..
and the dropships please let there be some kind of way where we can forge and or blast ppl with our weapons from there. now we cant even look side to side like we used to. |
ANON Illuminati
A.N.O.N.Y.M.O.U.S.
225
|
Posted - 2013.09.06 10:13:00 -
[4] - Quote
ChromeBreaker wrote:MOAR TARGETS!!!
YESSSSSSSSSSSSSS MOAR MEANS WARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR!! |
ANON Illuminati
A.N.O.N.Y.M.O.U.S.
225
|
Posted - 2013.09.06 10:17:00 -
[5] - Quote
the more ppl agree and hit the like button the more ccp should look into it. matterfact you dont have to like it just type in agree and we can all get what we want. shoot why not the nublets got aim assist lets all push for more ppl in one fight.
|
calvin b
Molon Labe.
RISE of LEGION
484
|
Posted - 2013.09.06 10:17:00 -
[6] - Quote
I agree 32vs. 32 is a good start. But i would love to see would be 75vs. 75, the skies would blacken with jets and DS as they dog fight and fall like angels from heaven. Like rolling thunder the ground quakes from the massive tank armadas.Then the curtain parts as wave upon wave of assault, logis, scouts, and heavies clash like a wave upon a cliff side. Bullets fly from all direction as the skies fill with volleys of rockets from swarm launchers and the sound of explosions make your heart skip and your eyes and ears bleed. All this before the snipers bullet cleaves your head from your shoulders. This is Dust 514, this is just another day in Hell |
steadyhand amarr
Imperfects
Negative-Feedback
1244
|
Posted - 2013.09.06 10:20:00 -
[7] - Quote
Ccp would love to do this but people's PS3 expoled when ever they try :-( |
Hecarim Van Hohen
Bullet Cluster
166
|
Posted - 2013.09.06 10:26:00 -
[8] - Quote
I'd welcome more mercs on the field, 16 v 16 < 24 v 24 < 32 v 32 any day.
More the merrier imo :3 |
M McManus
Sinq Laison Gendarmes
Gallente Federation
11
|
Posted - 2013.09.06 10:55:00 -
[9] - Quote
Yeah would be pretty sweet to play with 10fps considering we only get about 20fps inside the complex on the new maps! ! Can't wait to warp around on point and auto aim at 30+ people ! |
True Adamance
PIE Inc.
Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
1691
|
Posted - 2013.09.06 11:01:00 -
[10] - Quote
ANON Illuminati wrote:its just a game.
CCP any idea when u will add a 32 v 32 tho? new maps are huge and would be more exciting if there were more ppl to shoot at. especially if it was 32 v 32 corp fw matches. just saying its a great idea and i dont think people who play together as a unified and structured team would disagree.
give us what we want and what will make this game more entertaining also give us some kind of personal turrets or something like the squid looking robots you had in one video i think this will be awsome to use in huge maps w 32 players.
or atleast 24 v 24. ill be greatfull i promise i wont ask for anything else.
24v24 would be good for these map sizes. Remember that not all areas of a map need to be inhabited at once, all players naturally gravitate to a combat zone, with sections of the map not able to be manned it gives much needed flanking routes and areas for new forms of tactics to evolve.
This is perhaps the best thing about 1.4 |
|
|
pegasis prime
BIG BAD W0LVES
812
|
Posted - 2013.09.06 11:03:00 -
[11] - Quote
Mr adamans got it spot on. I would say 24/24 would be perfect for tge larger maps bit too big for the smaller ones so unless all the maps are enlarged I dont think ccp will go that way for a while. |
True Adamance
PIE Inc.
Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
1691
|
Posted - 2013.09.06 11:05:00 -
[12] - Quote
pegasis prime wrote:Mr adamans got it spot on. I would say 24/24 would be perfect for tge larger maps bit too big for the smaller ones so unless all the maps are enlarged I dont think ccp will go that way for a while.
Perhaps not though I always wondered why the teams were 16v16..... two and two thirds squads...... |
Assert Dominance
Ahrendee Mercenaries
EoN.
302
|
Posted - 2013.09.06 11:08:00 -
[13] - Quote
I dont ask for much, but squad lock for vehicles will go a looong way. It cant be that hard ccp. |
Annabandak Mercery
Knights Of Ender
63
|
Posted - 2013.09.06 11:08:00 -
[14] - Quote
+1 |
pegasis prime
BIG BAD W0LVES
812
|
Posted - 2013.09.06 11:14:00 -
[15] - Quote
Assert Dominance wrote:I dont ask for much, but squad lock for vehicles will go a looong way. It cant be that hard ccp.
Im sure they said 1.5 the tankes pardise is a coming. |
BLACKSTAR AND TSUBAKI
SVER True Blood
Public Disorder.
20
|
Posted - 2013.09.06 11:33:00 -
[16] - Quote
they should at least add 24 v 24 in PC matches that would give me better reason to want to play PC .... but first the got to fix the lag in PC
so much lag ;-; |
True Adamance
PIE Inc.
Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
1695
|
Posted - 2013.09.06 11:54:00 -
[17] - Quote
BLACKSTAR AND TSUBAKI wrote:they should at least add 24 v 24 in PC matches that would give me better reason to want to play PC .... but first the got to fix the lag in PC
so much lag ;-;
The hell do PC players get off thinking they deserve more than the general community? |
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |