DUST Search - Fixing the Litany of Respec Threads. A Compromise.

All Channels

General Discussions

Fixing the Litany of Respec Threads. A Compromise.

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 :: [one page]
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Gh0st C0de Spirit Collective 12	Posted - 2013.08.28 22:47:00 - [1] - Quote Respec threads are popping up like dandelions on a dunghill roght now. I personally think the only solution is to implement a very infrequent respec option, such as a yearly respec. New players start with one "respec token" type of object so that they can experiment before committing to a path. In addition, every year on a certain day all accounts receive one more which is valid until the next one is issued. In this way people can respec without it becoming out of control. No FOTM spam, but at the same time we can respec if CCP drastically alters something we were using.
Arkena Wyrnspire Turalyon 514 2805	Posted - 2013.08.28 22:51:00 - [2] - Quote No. This is not a new suggestion, by the way.
Mossellia Delt Militaires Sans Jeux 84	Posted - 2013.08.28 23:01:00 - [3] - Quote They should only allow reallocation of sp when they change a major gameplay mechanic and only for effected areas Like 1.4 they should allow scouts to reallocate their suit SP because CCPs making all their current "advantages" N/A 1.5 should allow vehicle reallocation because they are changing vehicles up completelly but see 1.3 shouldnt allow Cal-logi respects because its a very minor change
Gh0st C0de Spirit Collective 12	Posted - 2013.08.29 04:25:00 - [4] - Quote Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: No. This is not a new suggestion, by the way. I was not aware, I have not come accross the suggestion yet in my browsing, thank you for informing me. I would like to hear your reasoning, if you'd be kind enough to indulge me. It will assist me in grasping the totality of community members' thought processes in regards to this. Mossellia: Wouldn't a periodically granted full respec be less work for CCP than granting partial respecs whenever they alter something significantly? There would be disagreements over what constitutes significant changes. The easier an implementation would be for CCP the more likely it would be to actually happen.
Jason Pearson Seraphim Auxiliaries 2888	Posted - 2013.08.29 04:29:00 - [5] - Quote No, thanks. I expect a re-specs when they do major adjustments, such as the Vehicle/AV patch. If in the future there is massive changes for the way Dropsuits work, then I'd support a re-spec for that too, but we should be refunded for the skills they've changed if we're massively affected. King of the Forums // Seraphim <3 Comment and like this thread about PvE, Here! Also, check out the Indirect Fire ability, Here! gbghg wrote: CCP Rejavik CCP Shanghia Same company different studios, one has near perfected the player feedback process, the other is still rolling on the floor after it fell over its first baby step.
RA Drahcir Psygod9 140	Posted - 2013.08.29 04:29:00 - [6] - Quote more xSP events will nerf the respec threads.
Rynoceros Rise of Old Dudes 592	Posted - 2013.08.29 04:32:00 - [7] - Quote 10,000,000 ISK Or 10,000 Aurum Available once every 720 hours. (I've said this so many times that I'm just copying this to my clipboard for inevitable future use.)
KING CHECKMATE Bragian Order Amarr Empire 676	Posted - 2013.08.29 04:38:00 - [8] - Quote Rynoceros wrote: 10,000,000 ISK Or 10,000 Aurum Available once every 720 hours. (I've said this so many times that I'm just copying this to my clipboard for inevitable future use.) 10 mil is a fair price.
Slaytanical Chaotik Serenity 8	Posted - 2013.08.29 05:03:00 - [9] - Quote Meh, from my house, i say no to yearly respecs also. make like peanut butter!!! and spread yourself all over that bread. err skill tree i mean. any points spent in any skill are not wasted points. misplaced yea maybe but in my book if paid respecs become a option that means dust= pay to win. cuz everyone will be respeccing FOTM like fiends. if it is something that shatters the balance of the class for lots of peeps. by all means ccp should fix it. but just because your FOTM is not so FOTM any more nope nada.... i have solved this problem by sticking to a set game and skill plan.. laser rifle / smg .... even through the horrible iron sights! can i get a huzzah! for 1.4 but yea respecs espically paid ones. i say nay fellow mercs. NAY 07
Billi Gene Forty-Nine Fedayeen Minmatar Republic 364	Posted - 2013.08.29 05:07:00 - [10] - Quote its like this is a this is not a respec thread respec thread... and yet so obviously not!
Drevenger DUST University Ivy League 22	Posted - 2013.08.29 05:28:00 - [11] - Quote Well, the token idea was sorta my idea. There was two tokens given once new contexts, mechanics or specialisations is release. Name it when or how many but this is the best way to not flood a particular races or weapons FotM style. One token to reset one node and the second one to reset a skill tree branch forward. No skill book reimbursement fiasco, no respec in theory. If you allow a total respec again the balance will be affected again and its gonna be 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5 take two.
Blaze Ashra Holdfast Syndicate Amarr Empire 11	Posted - 2013.08.29 05:54:00 - [12] - Quote We don't even have all the options on the table yet. We can't even use galentte, caldari, minmatar heavies, amarr or caldari scouts, amarr of minmatar vehicles, MAV's, HAC, MTAC's, all the weapons or turrets. If they're going to do a respec, it should be after we have new content, not to give the biggest munkins a new way to game the system and narrow down the viable choices more and more.
KingBabar Ancient Exiles 1098	Posted - 2013.08.29 07:55:00 - [13] - Quote Jason Pearson wrote: No, thanks. I expect a re-specs when they do major adjustments, such as the Vehicle/AV patch. If in the future there is massive changes for the way Dropsuits work, then I'd support a re-spec for that too, but we should be refunded for the skills they've changed if we're massively affected. King of the Forums // Seraphim <3 Comment and like this thread about PvE, Here! Also, check out the Indirect Fire ability, Here! gbghg wrote: CCP Rejavik CCP Shanghia Same company different studios, one has near perfected the player feedback process, the other is still rolling on the floor after it fell over its first baby step. Like the Cal Logi suit nerf? .....
Xender17 Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN. 502	Posted - 2013.08.29 08:31:00 - [14] - Quote Jason Pearson wrote: No, thanks. I expect a re-specs when they do major adjustments, such as the Vehicle/AV patch. If in the future there is massive changes for the way Dropsuits work, then I'd support a re-spec for that too, but we should be refunded for the skills they've changed if we're massively affected. King of the Forums // Seraphim <3 Comment and like this thread about PvE, Here! Also, check out the Indirect Fire ability, Here! gbghg wrote: CCP Rejavik CCP Shanghia Same company different studios, one has near perfected the player feedback process, the other is still rolling on the floor after it fell over its first baby step. Are you the Gunnlogi thats said to be the best? If so, can you tell me your build? (through mail if you are that secretive, if at all you chose to)

Pages: 1 :: [one page]

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.