I know some of you do not care about these events and some of us do. My question is how is this event even fair? You have no choice over what side you are. So you get thrown into the mix and well you lose, you lose a lot. Not your fault or anyone else, its just a mismatched system. So your logic is squad up and STFU, well that is all good for me, but what about the new guys. They squad up and they still lose, over and over again. What I am getting to is how can we have an event were you are based on wins or loses when matchmaking comes at the end of the event You can try and win every match, but not likely by yourself. Now granted you only have to win 48% week 1, week 2 is 45%, and week 3 is 42% of you matches out of 30 matches first week, 40 the next, and 50 the last week. So my question to you dust bunnies is do you feel this event should have been after match making or fine as it is?

We've consulted heavily with the Council of Planetary Management and listened to your feedback from previous events to determine our reward schedule for this event and we are hopeful you'll enjoy it!

I know some of you do not care about these events and some of us do. My question is how is this event even fair? You have no choice over what side you are. So you get thrown into the mix and well you lose, you lose a lot. Not your fault or anyone else, its just a mismatched system. So your logic is squad up and STFU, well that is all good for me, but what about the new guys. They squad up and they still lose, over and over again. What I am getting to is how can we have an event were you are based on wins or loses when matchmaking comes at the end of the event You can try and win every match, but not likely by yourself. Now granted you only have to win 48% week 1, week 2 is 45%, and week 3 is 42% of you matches out of 30 matches first week, 40 the next, and 50 the last week. So my question to you dust bunnies is do you feel this event should have been after match making or fine as it is?

You seem to have this down wrong, its over 2 weeks not 3
to qualify for all tiers you have to -
win 48% of your first 30 matches - for tier 1
win 45% of your first 40 matches - for tier 2
win 42% of your first 50 matches - for tier 3
same with week 2

And the squad up logic is as basic as can be,
I won 92% of my first 50 matches - if you dont want that to happen then your squad has to stop me
Simples

this game always has, and always will reward you for teamwork and punish you for playing solo
if youre new you dont even know about the challenge - but you can still join a corp and squad up
really if you dont have the time and effort to put into the game why should you be given anything?

I know some of you do not care about these events and some of us do. My question is how is this event even fair? You have no choice over what side you are. So you get thrown into the mix and well you lose, you lose a lot. Not your fault or anyone else, its just a mismatched system. So your logic is squad up and STFU, well that is all good for me, but what about the new guys. They squad up and they still lose, over and over again. What I am getting to is how can we have an event were you are based on wins or loses when matchmaking comes at the end of the event You can try and win every match, but not likely by yourself. Now granted you only have to win 48% week 1, week 2 is 45%, and week 3 is 42% of you matches out of 30 matches first week, 40 the next, and 50 the last week. So my question to you dust bunnies is do you feel this event should have been after match making or fine as it is?