| Pages: 1 :: [one page] |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Anmol Singh
the unholy legion of darkstar
DARKSTAR ARMY
300
   |
Posted - 2013.08.27 23:28:00 -
[1] - Quote
CCP, if your trying to make vehicles fun, then just stop before you make most vehicle drivers quit... A prime example of a fun weapon: NOVA knife.. is it good no, does it make money for you-no...
This game is about surviving not about fun, because when things are fun-you lose money... nobody wants to lose money... when people lose money and have no ability to change what that specced into they quit... and when they quit this game dies... which has already happened..
dont nerf tanks.. seriously dont listen to the militia scrubs that can kill good tanks with their militia swarms... listen to the tankers that get killed by proto AV...
The suppose "buffs" your giving in 1.5 don't sound so good from what your saying... good luck with this game but who am I to judge you don't listen to nobody. |
Chris F2112
A.N.O.N.Y.M.O.U.S.
366
|
Posted - 2013.08.27 23:32:00 -
[2] - Quote
And they certainly shouldn't listen to people who cannot even wait for numbers before passing judgment on the patch. I think it sounds like a good step in the right direction. |
Luk Manag
of Terror
67
|
Posted - 2013.08.27 23:34:00 -
[3] - Quote
Tanks would be more fun if you could lose one or two and still remain profitable. |
Anmol Singh
the unholy legion of darkstar
DARKSTAR ARMY
300
|
Posted - 2013.08.27 23:35:00 -
[4] - Quote
Chris F2112 wrote:And they certainly shouldn't listen to people who cannot even wait for numbers before passing judgment on the patch. I think it sounds like a good step in the right direction.
when am i passing judgement, im just say that if this (what ever this is) happens, people might not like it... |
Anmol Singh
the unholy legion of darkstar
DARKSTAR ARMY
300
|
Posted - 2013.08.27 23:35:00 -
[5] - Quote
Luk Manag wrote:Tanks would be more fun if you could lose one or two and still remain profitable.
BF3 funnest game ever.. |
Luk Manag
of Terror
67
|
Posted - 2013.08.27 23:39:00 -
[6] - Quote
Anmol Singh wrote:Luk Manag wrote:Tanks would be more fun if you could lose one or two and still remain profitable. BF3 funnest game ever..
Yeah, why not have maps that come with a free tank at the start of the match? |
Anmol Singh
the unholy legion of darkstar
DARKSTAR ARMY
300
|
Posted - 2013.08.27 23:41:00 -
[7] - Quote
Luk Manag wrote:Anmol Singh wrote:Luk Manag wrote:Tanks would be more fun if you could lose one or two and still remain profitable. BF3 funnest game ever.. Yeah, why not have maps that come with a free tank at the start of the match?
dude BF3 was fun... Dust is kind of serious but it can be fun if your willing to spend a lot of isk a match and if you use remote explosives... |
Spkr4theDead
International-Fleet
503
|
Posted - 2013.08.27 23:41:00 -
[8] - Quote
Chris F2112 wrote:And they certainly shouldn't listen to people who cannot even wait for numbers before passing judgment on the patch. I think it sounds like a good step in the right direction.
So why should we listen to people that don't pilot vehicles? |
Anmol Singh
the unholy legion of darkstar
DARKSTAR ARMY
300
|
Posted - 2013.08.27 23:42:00 -
[9] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:Chris F2112 wrote:And they certainly shouldn't listen to people who cannot even wait for numbers before passing judgment on the patch. I think it sounds like a good step in the right direction. So why should we listen to people that don't pilot vehicles?
OOO burnn... |
Monkey MAC
killer taxi company
General Tso's Alliance
19
|
Posted - 2013.08.27 23:44:00 -
[10] - Quote
Anmol Singh wrote:Luk Manag wrote:Tanks would be more fun if you could lose one or two and still remain profitable. BF3 funnest game ever..
Yet everythimg in there can be blown up by a guy with a helicopter sounds great! You go play that and well play this or is that not fun enough? |
|
|
Anmol Singh
the unholy legion of darkstar
DARKSTAR ARMY
300
|
Posted - 2013.08.27 23:47:00 -
[11] - Quote
Monkey MAC wrote:Anmol Singh wrote:Luk Manag wrote:Tanks would be more fun if you could lose one or two and still remain profitable. BF3 funnest game ever.. Yet everythimg in there can be blown up by a guy with a helicopter sounds great! You go play that and well play this or is that not fun enough?
Why so negative.. did i say something wrong? i meant it is a really fun game |
Bittersteel the Bastard
WarRavens
League of Infamy
316
|
Posted - 2013.08.28 00:03:00 -
[12] - Quote
No. Just. No. |
Seymor Krelborn
DUST University
Ivy League
655
|
Posted - 2013.08.28 00:07:00 -
[13] - Quote
1.5 looks like a great move... will actually need to see more in depth coverage of the finer points, and then play it myself to be sure, but everything I read in that post looks good so far....
the OP is not seeing the bigger picture here, disregard him CCP. |
BL4CKST4R
WarRavens
League of Infamy
1268
|
Posted - 2013.08.28 00:17:00 -
[14] - Quote
Anmol Singh wrote:CCP, if your trying to make vehicles fun, then just stop before you make most vehicle drivers quit... A prime example of a fun weapon: NOVA knife.. is it good no, does it make money for you-no...
This game is about surviving not about fun, because when things are fun-you lose money... nobody wants to lose money... when people lose money and have no ability to change what that specced into they quit... and when they quit this game dies... which has already happened..
dont nerf tanks.. seriously dont listen to the militia scrubs that can kill good tanks with their militia swarms... listen to the tankers that get killed by proto AV...
The suppose "buffs" your giving in 1.5 don't sound so good from what your saying... good luck with this game but who am I to judge you don't listen to nobody.
Then give players more money... |
Criteria Shipment
Baynaer Space Command
The Ditanian Alliance
299
|
Posted - 2013.08.28 00:23:00 -
[15] - Quote
BL4CKST4R wrote:Anmol Singh wrote:CCP, if your trying to make vehicles fun, then just stop before you make most vehicle drivers quit... A prime example of a fun weapon: NOVA knife.. is it good no, does it make money for you-no...
This game is about surviving not about fun, because when things are fun-you lose money... nobody wants to lose money... when people lose money and have no ability to change what that specced into they quit... and when they quit this game dies... which has already happened..
dont nerf tanks.. seriously dont listen to the militia scrubs that can kill good tanks with their militia swarms... listen to the tankers that get killed by proto AV...
The suppose "buffs" your giving in 1.5 don't sound so good from what your saying... good luck with this game but who am I to judge you don't listen to nobody. Then give players more money...
...to waste? |
Aizen Intiki
Ghost Wolf Industries
Alpha Wolf Pack
538
|
Posted - 2013.08.28 00:25:00 -
[16] - Quote
Seems like a whole bunch of buffs imo...... |
Bojo The Mighty
Zanzibar Concept
1592
|
Posted - 2013.08.28 00:26:00 -
[17] - Quote
I've heard nothing but whining, mostly from suspected HAV's.
Look, 1.5 is supposed to make vehicles FUN. Vehicles aren't supposed to be easy-mode and as a pilot I look forward to seeing the extremes of shields and armor, of passive and active, of firepower vs pacifists.
Quit your whining, Nova Knifers don't whine, so don't reference them. You're only going to associate them with this crap. Nova Knifers have FUN. If you are so obsessed with survival you would not have become a vehicle operator in the first place! |
Blaze Ashra
Holdfast Syndicate
Amarr Empire
4
|
Posted - 2013.08.28 00:34:00 -
[18] - Quote
It doesn't exactly sound bad from my point of view but I'm more concerned with the stats and what's going to be changed. For the most part it sounds like they're making vehicles into armored infantry units. I'm hoping that they will let vehicles have some version of equipment that's replenish-able at supply depots so I can drop ammo or repair points to tankers that are in combat.
It sounds like they're just setting up as stable a foundation as they can and want to build upon it. This would be pretty cool, and I like the idea that vehicles will have roles and be customizable but I'm also hoping with this out of the way we can finally get racial variants and counter measures.
I'm hoping for the best. |
Aizen Intiki
Ghost Wolf Industries
Alpha Wolf Pack
538
|
Posted - 2013.08.28 00:40:00 -
[19] - Quote
Bojo The Mighty wrote:I've heard nothing but whining, mostly from suspected HAV's.
Look, 1.5 is supposed to make vehicles FUN. Vehicles aren't supposed to be easy-mode and as a pilot I look forward to seeing the extremes of shields and armor, of passive and active, of firepower vs pacifists.
Quit your whining, Nova Knifers don't whine, so don't reference them. You're only going to associate them with this crap. Nova Knifers have FUN. If you are so obsessed with survival you would not have become a vehicle operator in the first place!
Nova-knifers do whine, they're are just quiet about it. Anyways, I don't get the whining, as it seems like a bunch of buffs to me. Would have preferred a removal of PROTO and STD AV, changing AV nades into Stasis grenades, and a rework of the vehicles themselves, specifically the T II hulls, but I'll take this. |
Marston VC
SVER True Blood
Public Disorder.
700
|
Posted - 2013.08.28 00:46:00 -
[20] - Quote
Chris F2112 wrote:And they certainly shouldn't listen to people who cannot even wait for numbers before passing judgment on the patch. I think it sounds like a good step in the right direction.
agreed, I think its a bit odd that somebody thinks this GAME shouldn't be about fun...... my interpretation of the meaning behind games must be a bit off from the authors.
My main battle suit costs me 250k isk and I enjoy playing it a lot, and yes I do make money using it. Of course..... I cant really die in it (or else I lose money) but most games I don't die more then once anyway, so im either breaking even or making mad money. Not that money even really matters in this game anyway, soooooo yeahhhhh I do have fun playing this game, and I don't think its a bad thing for tankers to have fun either (so long as "fun" doesn't mean bringing the old missiles back......) |
|
|
Michael Arck
sephiroth clones
D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
660
|
Posted - 2013.08.28 01:12:00 -
[21] - Quote
This is stupid. When I read "This game is about surviving not fun" I just threw up my hands. Abandon thread
|
Monkey MAC
killer taxi company
General Tso's Alliance
26
|
Posted - 2013.08.28 01:20:00 -
[22] - Quote
Anmol Singh wrote:Monkey MAC wrote:Anmol Singh wrote:Luk Manag wrote:Tanks would be more fun if you could lose one or two and still remain profitable. BF3 funnest game ever.. Yet everythimg in there can be blown up by a guy with a helicopter sounds great! You go play that and well play this or is that not fun enough? Why so negative.. did i say something wrong? i meant it is a really fun game
Because your whining, give evidence that can be backed up nova knives are highly situational and I have seen them on the market top sellers numerous times, for evidence on how devasting they can be see the thread my first time with a legend!!
Back to the matter at hand if means tanks cant rush in, and the f%/^ everything around that letter till the end of the match withou infantry support, something that can be done at moment!! |
Chris F2112
A.N.O.N.Y.M.O.U.S.
374
|
Posted - 2013.08.28 01:39:00 -
[23] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:Chris F2112 wrote:And they certainly shouldn't listen to people who cannot even wait for numbers before passing judgment on the patch. I think it sounds like a good step in the right direction. So why should we listen to people that don't pilot vehicles?
I do have alts you know...
One of them happens to be dropships and tanks. |
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 :: [one page] |