| Pages: 1 :: [one page] |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Charlotte O'Dell
0uter.Heaven
1046
   |
Posted - 2013.08.23 04:45:00 -
[1] - Quote
Large and small, they're horrible for killing infantry.
Honestly, they need to have the damage output of the Core Flaylock in 1.2, seeing as they are mounted on a tank |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles
891
|
Posted - 2013.08.23 04:49:00 -
[2] - Quote
Charlotte O'Dell wrote:Large and small, they're horrible for killing infantry.
Honestly, they need to have the damage output of the Core Flaylock in 1.2, seeing as they are mounted on a tank
and need to have more splash range than mass drivers
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=103910&find=unread |
Hexen Trickster
Industrial removal service
39
|
Posted - 2013.08.23 09:35:00 -
[3] - Quote
imo larges are fine (ill happly take more aoe tho) its just really damn hard to directally hit your target if they are higher than you
What i really want to see are 'cruise' missiles that serve more of a bombardment purpose and fire in a high arc
all i know is missiles are quite horrible next to other large turrets, they dont have the anti dropsuit power of the blaster (also not the av but thats an issue with blasters not missiles) and they dont have the range next to railguns. Missiles only benefit sofar is being explosive (in a game with mainly gunlogis) and they deal some splash damage in a attempt to hit the guys hiding behind a box |
THE TRAINSPOTTER
ROMANIA Renegades
C0VEN
192
|
Posted - 2013.08.23 09:47:00 -
[4] - Quote
carliotta lets talk sexy |
Vallud Eadesso
Subdreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
281
|
Posted - 2013.08.23 09:50:00 -
[5] - Quote
Charlotte O'Dell wrote:Large and small, they're horrible for killing infantry.
Honestly, they need to have the damage output of the Core Flaylock in 1.2, seeing as they are mounted on a tank
I imagine with that many likes you were around for the MPT first beta? Missile Turrets were essentially broken beyond repair and were INCREDIBLY powerful. They were nerfed to what we have today and i've seen or heard nothing about em since. That means it NEEDS a buff!
My reasoning is this: If someone ain't complaining about it on the forums, it's underpowered. Because people only complain about what kills them. |
Jason Pearson
Seraphim Auxiliaries
2653
|
Posted - 2013.08.23 10:12:00 -
[6] - Quote
God I miss sniping from a Dropship with those old missiles.. Sit at the back of the map with a XT Accelerated Missile Turret, fire at black dots across the map and end the game with 60/0.
King of the Forums // Seraphim <3
Comment and like this thread about PvE, Here!
Also, check out the Indirect Fire ability, Here!
gbghg wrote:CCP Rejavik
CCP Shanghia
Same company different studios, one has near perfected the player feedback process, the other is still rolling on the floor after it fell over its first baby step. |
Misses Trickster
Industrial removal service
11
|
Posted - 2013.08.23 10:16:00 -
[7] - Quote
Vallud Eadesso wrote:Charlotte O'Dell wrote:Large and small, they're horrible for killing infantry.
Honestly, they need to have the damage output of the Core Flaylock in 1.2, seeing as they are mounted on a tank I imagine with that many likes you were around for the MPT first beta? Missile Turrets were essentially broken beyond repair and were INCREDIBLY powerful. They were nerfed to what we have today and i've seen or heard nothing about em since. That means it NEEDS a buff! My reasoning is this: If someone ain't complaining about it on the forums, it's underpowered. Because people only complain about what kills them.
Oh god those dropships on the towers with small missile turrets.. never again
But idk much about large missile turrets back then, didnt see very much of them it was mainly bpo tanks with there regular weapons |
Charlotte O'Dell
0uter.Heaven
1053
|
Posted - 2013.08.23 18:43:00 -
[8] - Quote
Jason Pearson wrote:God I miss sniping from a Dropship with those old missiles.. Sit at the back of the map with a XT Accelerated Missile Turret, fire at black dots across the map and end the game with 60/0.
King of the Forums // Seraphim <3 Comment and like this thread about PvE, Here!Also, check out the Indirect Fire ability, Here!gbghg wrote:CCP Rejavik
CCP Shanghia
Same company different studios, one has near perfected the player feedback process, the other is still rolling on the floor after it fell over its first baby step.
You have more likes than me; you must be destroyed!
I guess you deserve the title King of the Forums... hahaha |
Cy Clone1
Intara Direct Action
Caldari State
220
|
Posted - 2013.08.23 18:56:00 -
[9] - Quote
small are great, large still suck |
Ku Shala
Planetary Response Organization
Test Friends Please Ignore
346
|
Posted - 2013.08.23 19:00:00 -
[10] - Quote
Bigger splash PLZ! |
|
|
Foundation Seldon
Gespenster Kompanie
Villore Accords
67
|
Posted - 2013.08.23 19:13:00 -
[11] - Quote
Honestly I'd be fine with Missile turrets in their current incarnation if they just severely reduced the ridiculous momentum that came with using them in a moving vehicle. Right now their aim becomes severely unstable when used in that instance. |
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 :: [one page] |