TL;DR, just skimmed.

Basically the CEO can bestow any rank to anyone, than each rank after that can give the ranks below that rank.

Only sergeants could be squad leaders, and the lowest rank can resign people?

And if you leave the corp your in and start your own corp you get ranked as a Major, but can't be a squad leader until you get more people in your corp?

This is confusing... Mercs don't need ranks, Meeko's idea of giving titles that don't really mean anything other than their value to the corp would be better.

Derp.

Allow us to give corp mates special title that mean nothing.

An Amarr Corp may want to give the Corp members titles like "Knight" and "Paladin or some other stuff.

A Cal Corp may want to give people titles like "Manager" or "Sercurity Guard" and the like.

This isn't quite needed if we could do that.

The ranks you listed are just titles inside the corp that are coming SoonGäó

Even if it is coming soon I hope they will be not just titles but relative to roles responsibilities.

Well as I said there is not much space to write so I resumed a lot of things.

Sergeants are the first rank possible to take squad lead. Because each new rank cumulates abilities from previous, plus new ones.

No you get ranked specifically to quantity of members your corp posses.

Yes each race may have other designation for a rank, that is not the point.

I gave a small specification that officer ranks can resign enlisted mates or officers if in lower rank.

Seems a bit confusing but I will clarify points later.

But the game shouldn't force those responsibilities on the player, it should be the other way around.





It's a lot confusing.

So if a player is, lets say the second highest rank in their current corp and then starts a new corp and is bumped back down to the lowest rank for starting a new corp, he'd be able to give higher ranks than his? He'd basically reset his rank, removing any cumulative effects from when he was in his previous corp.

If he only had a 6 man corp none of them could be in a squad together unless the CEO was able to make someone a Sergeant, and than the CEO could get booted from his own corp just because some new guy was like "Make me a Sergeant! I'm good!"

And, while it would be cool for the whole "don't trust anyone" meta game, nothing would stop a plant from joining a corp on dust, making his way to the top (or near top), and than kick everyone out only to steal everything... or if someone has a bad day that isn't the CEO he could remove any player that's ranked lower than him.

each race has its own milita ranking system in eve, the players who participate in faction warfare get ranked up or dow according to their influence in the war effort i hope that when ccp revamps merc battles they will implement this system for us alog with the faction standing and lp stores

The basic idea of handing out ranks and titles is good. It can remind a corp who there more experienced players are, and those who have leadership experience.

That is probably whole my point about ranking, players will more likely to join a good standing corp seeing great players in it. Leaders harshness must be ensured too because I won't give someone a rank just if they want it, they must deserve it.
How can I see it? Statistics of each player.

I think ranks should stay in corp, it'd be too easy for someone to start a corp and abuse the title power.

as long as the rank isnt important...


the funny thing about most ranks i see in game is that most ppl look at a player with a low rank... think the match will be easy..

and then get their asses kicked afterwards for taunting...


it may be funny at most times buts its not a something important for dust 514...

pve should come first..