Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [20] 30 40 |
381. Discussion: Shield vs Armor - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sgt Kirk wrote: I agree with Damage threshold and Hardeners but as far as meta goes these are the weapons that are good against armor: Projectile - combat rifles, smgs, HMGs Explosive - Grenades (which if you're into your armor and a grenade ...
- by duster 35000 - at 2015.03.17 19:46:00
|
382. Fuking tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sgt Kirk wrote: I'll never take shield tankers seriously if they keep trying to 1v1 me in CQC. I just can't do it, just a few hours ago I took on an entire tank convoy of DUNA tanks in my gv.0 Madrugar. They were all ADV Shield Gunlogis wit...
- by duster 35000 - at 2015.03.17 08:56:00
|
383. Good news, everyone! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Joel II X wrote: What kind of witchcraft... Friendship is witchcraft.
- by duster 35000 - at 2015.03.17 06:55:00
|
384. Concerning Amarr Ak.0 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Apocalyptic Destroyer wrote: duster 35000 wrote: Apocalyptic Destroyer wrote: Looking at All the fits in protofits.com was horrible for the Amarr Assault Ak.0 . They're all fit very badly. (I feel mine is best, not too much armor, not too...
- by duster 35000 - at 2015.03.17 05:28:00
|
385. I guess there are not enough AmAssaults - in General Discussions [original thread]
xavier zor wrote: LT SHANKS wrote: around for people to start screaming "Nerf!" over. My Carthum Assault ScR with 5% warbarge damage bonus, complex damage mods, and Proficiency makes easy work of even Heavies in CQC. At range, RR users simpl...
- by duster 35000 - at 2015.03.17 05:22:00
|
386. Concerning Amarr Ak.0 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Apocalyptic Destroyer wrote: Looking at All the fits in protofits.com was horrible for the Amarr Assault Ak.0 . They're all fit very badly. (I feel mine is best, not too much armor, not too light 500+ Armor, about 20+ reps) I have a perfect ...
- by duster 35000 - at 2015.03.17 05:20:00
|
387. My skirmish adventure - in General Discussions [original thread]
Wherever I am
- by duster 35000 - at 2015.03.17 05:15:00
|
388. My skirmish adventure - in General Discussions [original thread]
Apocalyptic Destroyer wrote: Go drunk, you're home. Lel Bite the dry, I'm going in pillow.
- by duster 35000 - at 2015.03.17 05:10:00
|
389. My skirmish adventure - in General Discussions [original thread]
Every day
- by duster 35000 - at 2015.03.17 05:09:00
|
390. My skirmish adventure - in General Discussions [original thread]
Let me tell you a tale of wonder, humor and adventure. I once was in a match of skirmish in which I held all the points, killing everybody in sight without dying, getting all the wp, cuz bitches love wp, then proceeded to kick the enemies asses ...
- by duster 35000 - at 2015.03.17 05:06:00
|
391. Fuking tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: duster 35000 wrote: True Adamance wrote: duster 35000 wrote: WeapondigitX V7 wrote: The activation delay of active modules on tanks just needs to be increased from 1 second to 4 seconds, then infantry would have...
- by duster 35000 - at 2015.03.17 05:03:00
|
392. Fuking tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: duster 35000 wrote: WeapondigitX V7 wrote: The activation delay of active modules on tanks just needs to be increased from 1 second to 4 seconds, then infantry would have a chance at ambushing tanks. I think I will ma...
- by duster 35000 - at 2015.03.17 04:01:00
|
393. In depth chart explaining why Scrambler is OP - in General Discussions [original thread]
Meh, very op vs shields, meh vs armor, compared to, a CR, but whatever, no one uses shields, especially since the ASCR makes the ScR obsolete, more armor dps.
- by duster 35000 - at 2015.03.17 02:55:00
|
394. Fuking tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
WeapondigitX V7 wrote: The activation delay of active modules on tanks just needs to be increased from 1 second to 4 seconds, then infantry would have a chance at ambushing tanks. I think I will make my own thread about that. I will say that it...
- by duster 35000 - at 2015.03.17 02:44:00
|
395. Fuking tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
DUST Fiend wrote: New tanks are laughably OP. I troll around with dual hardener dual rep blaster maddy and i went 17/0 this morning while simultaneously playing hearthstone :D So easy :) Armor tanks are impossible to kill with a non ion can...
- by duster 35000 - at 2015.03.17 02:42:00
|
396. Fuking tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
J0LLY R0G3R wrote: Reign Omega wrote: Duck. Duck Draconaquus
- by duster 35000 - at 2015.03.17 02:41:00
|
397. Fuking tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
The dark cloud wrote: Sounds like if you encountered a rep tank fit. It looks somewhat like this: http://www.protofits.com/fittings/shared/0/12543 If he switched both hardeners on he basically had godmode and nothing could kill him except fo...
- by duster 35000 - at 2015.03.17 00:32:00
|
398. Fuking tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Izlare Lenix wrote: So I was running around in a scout av suit with plasma cannon, lai dai packed av nades and advanced REs. This marduk was getting shoot at by a friendly tank. He was in half armor, hardner active when I first saw him. I fir...
- by duster 35000 - at 2015.03.17 00:30:00
|
399. HOLY @#$@!!!!! The invisibility glitch is back. - in General Discussions [original thread]
LOOKMOM NOHANDS wrote: TooMany Names AlreadyTaken wrote: Was this glitch captured on camera? I don't think I've ever seen it. Not the greatest quality. It was an awesome time until people learned how to replicate it and it got annoying. I...
- by duster 35000 - at 2015.03.16 17:33:00
|
400. about the nanohive bonus... - in General Discussions [original thread]
xavier zor wrote: will the caldari logi be worth using now? I think it will be worth using All low slots ferro plates 2 triage hives, to pkace 2 everywhere. Mmmmmmmmmmmm. I CA-...
- by duster 35000 - at 2015.03.16 03:37:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [20] 30 40 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |