| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 20 |
181. The real scoop on Imperfects Vs. D3lta force war. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Congratulations on the new districts guys.
- by Ric Barlom - at 2013.05.21 06:21:00
|
182. Imperfects think less of Internal Error - in General Discussions [original thread]
You know, guys, I've been reading these threads now for some months already and every time I read one of these type of threads it reminds of an old saying we've got up here in the north: If you ain't got **** to say, and you aren't sucking my ****...
- by Ric Barlom - at 2013.05.19 21:55:00
|
183. Imperfects Official Statement: Delta Force - in General Discussions [original thread]
ReGnUM Public Relations wrote: As the leaders of the free mercenary world, The Imperfects by nature are non aggressive. ReGnYuM I don't think you got the memo where your guys "came clean" for 10 times that you guys aren't even trying to...
- by Ric Barlom - at 2013.05.19 11:36:00
|
184. How many female tankers are there really? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mortedeamor wrote: Ric Barlom wrote: Alright here we go again, guys. Another cat fight in the Dust 514 forums, man, no big deal, but I'm sure it sheds some light into the fact why I proposed a limit for female players per one corporation. I ...
- by Ric Barlom - at 2013.05.19 11:17:00
|
185. How many female tankers are there really? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Alright here we go again, guys. Another cat fight in the Dust 514 forums, man, no big deal, but I'm sure it sheds some light into the fact why I proposed a limit for female players per one corporation. I mean my God, these two aren't even anywhere...
- by Ric Barlom - at 2013.05.19 11:05:00
|
186. The imps must behind the sabatage crews? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Paran Tadec wrote: Ric Barlom wrote: Well, guys, this is an interesting question and many have been wondering who exactly was behind this whole sabotage thing. Well I started my own investigation immediately after the incident and confirmed ...
- by Ric Barlom - at 2013.05.18 22:02:00
|
187. The imps must behind the sabatage crews? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Eltra Ardell wrote: So this is Forum PvP, huh? Neat. DUST gets more like EVE every day hour. Nothing too serious, bro. Was just busting people's balls a little bit so to speak.
- by Ric Barlom - at 2013.05.18 16:23:00
|
188. The imps must behind the sabatage crews? - in General Discussions [original thread]
So guys, ever since I posted in this thread, I've been receiving a lot of negative feedback both in game and in these forums so I decided to make a little follow up statement, man. First of all, let me apologise to all those people out there who g...
- by Ric Barlom - at 2013.05.18 15:17:00
|
189. The imps must behind the sabatage crews? - in General Discussions [original thread]
SoTa of PoP wrote: Ric Barlom wrote: Alright everyone, this has gotten totally out of hand so I had to upload the tapes, guys, and keep in mind that it was you who forced my hand. That being said, I take no responsibility of the ramification...
- by Ric Barlom - at 2013.05.18 11:16:00
|
190. The imps must behind the sabatage crews? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Medic 1879 wrote: EDIT'd ^ Video doesn't work but it says what it is lol. Well no worries I've got a transcript of this nefarious conversation that occurred middle of last night EVE time: We're no strangers to love You know the rules and s...
- by Ric Barlom - at 2013.05.18 11:11:00
|
191. The imps must behind the sabatage crews? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Alright everyone, this has gotten totally out of hand so I had to upload the tapes, guys, and keep in mind that it was you who forced my hand. That being said, I take no responsibility of the ramifications of this revelation: Let me present the ...
- by Ric Barlom - at 2013.05.18 10:54:00
|
192. The imps must behind the sabatage crews? - in General Discussions [original thread]
SoTa of PoP wrote: Ric Barlom wrote: SoTa of PoP wrote: Ric Barlom wrote: Well here's the thing, dude, and let me be perfectly clear with you here so that even you can understand where I'm coming from here. I'm not asking anyone to tr...
- by Ric Barlom - at 2013.05.18 10:15:00
|
193. The imps must behind the sabatage crews? - in General Discussions [original thread]
SoTa of PoP wrote: Ric Barlom wrote: Well here's the thing, dude, and let me be perfectly clear with you here so that even you can understand where I'm coming from here. I'm not asking anyone to trust me, but I did paint a picture for every...
- by Ric Barlom - at 2013.05.18 10:13:00
|
194. The imps must behind the sabatage crews? - in General Discussions [original thread]
SoTa of PoP wrote: Ric Barlom wrote: SoTa ReGnUM PoP wrote: Ric Barlom wrote: SoTa ReGnUM PoP wrote: But... you haven't said anything... anyone can claim anything they want - without proof it's obvious bull. I know you were raised u...
- by Ric Barlom - at 2013.05.18 10:07:00
|
195. The imps must behind the sabatage crews? - in General Discussions [original thread]
SoTa ReGnUM PoP wrote: Ric Barlom wrote: SoTa ReGnUM PoP wrote: But... you haven't said anything... anyone can claim anything they want - without proof it's obvious bull. I know you were raised under a rock but come on. Thanks for trying...
- by Ric Barlom - at 2013.05.18 09:59:00
|
196. The imps must behind the sabatage crews? - in General Discussions [original thread]
SoTa ReGnUM PoP wrote: But... you haven't said anything... anyone can claim anything they want - without proof it's obvious bull. I know you were raised under a rock but come on. Thanks for trying though. Reminds me when you were saying your a...
- by Ric Barlom - at 2013.05.18 09:52:00
|
197. The imps must behind the sabatage crews? - in General Discussions [original thread]
SoTa ReGnUM PoP wrote: Ric Barlom wrote: SoTa of PoP wrote: Ric Barlom wrote: SoTa of PoP wrote: And yet another dodge so you don't have to admit you have no evidence and are basing everything on assumptions you read on the forums....
- by Ric Barlom - at 2013.05.18 09:44:00
|
198. The imps must behind the sabatage crews? - in General Discussions [original thread]
SoTa of PoP wrote: Ric Barlom wrote: SoTa of PoP wrote: And yet another dodge so you don't have to admit you have no evidence and are basing everything on assumptions you read on the forums. :) Spies are for more then sabotage scrub. I'...
- by Ric Barlom - at 2013.05.18 09:36:00
|
199. The imps must behind the sabatage crews? - in General Discussions [original thread]
SoTa of PoP wrote: And yet another dodge so you don't have to admit you have no evidence and are basing everything on assumptions you read on the forums. :) Spies are for more then sabotage scrub. I'm glad you want E-fame through us but try t...
- by Ric Barlom - at 2013.05.18 09:29:00
|
200. The imps must behind the sabatage crews? - in General Discussions [original thread]
SoTa of PoP wrote: Ric Barlom wrote: SoTa of PoP wrote: Ric Barlom wrote: Well unlike you, bro, I'm acting perfectly professionally here, and I don't plan to get my account banned anytime soon either. Cause let me tell you something r...
- by Ric Barlom - at 2013.05.18 09:24:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 20 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |