| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 |
1281. Finally, Tanks Make Dust 514 a True Battlefield - in General Discussions [original thread]
Makyre Vahliha wrote: The hot topic seems to be about tanks now. I was pleasantly surprised to see a lot of tanks prowling around, about 3-5 per match. It really felt like a war. Just throw in MTAC and Jet Fighters, then it'll be intense. I hon...
- by KenKaniff69 - at 2013.07.22 20:03:00
|
1282. Where's our Vehicle Dev? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Maybe there is a legal battle going on where they can't say anything about him. I am not sure but legal conflicts with hack lawyers on both sides are really nasty
- by KenKaniff69 - at 2013.07.22 00:55:00
|
1283. Armor reps need to be fixed so all tanks can die - in General Discussions [original thread]
We need to be able to put bounties on people like shadowdude3. Just had to remove the last of what tanks had, rather than do the obvious, right thing-buff shield tanks
- by KenKaniff69 - at 2013.07.21 19:48:00
|
1284. CCP's Failure to Lead on Vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Pvt Numnutz wrote: MarasdF Loron wrote: Pvt Numnutz wrote: Well that's a good reason for tankers to play it safe instead of gunhoe gi joe. All I'm saying is teamwork is the most OP weapon in this game. I had the luxury of realising from t...
- by KenKaniff69 - at 2013.07.21 19:07:00
|
1285. CCP's Failure to Lead on Vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: knows nothing about vehicles or the role they should fill Stop posting on vehicle threads unless you have fair criticism. You clearly have little idea how the life of a vehicle specialist has been. Stop being a CCP lap...
- by KenKaniff69 - at 2013.07.21 18:39:00
|
1286. CCP's Failure to Lead on Vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cyra Celeste wrote: Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Bones McGavins wrote: Another solution would be to increase tanking a ton like 3-4x health but drastically reduce the ability to self heal. Basically what can't happen is tanks requiring 10-20 pr...
- by KenKaniff69 - at 2013.07.21 18:32:00
|
1287. CCP's Failure to Lead on Vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
MarasdF Loron wrote: Pvt Numnutz wrote: Well that's a good reason for tankers to play it safe instead of gunhoe gi joe. All I'm saying is teamwork is the most OP weapon in this game. I had the luxury of realising from the myron stage that I'...
- by KenKaniff69 - at 2013.07.21 17:49:00
|
1288. CCP's Failure to Lead on Vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
LT apparition wrote: Perhaps your just a crappy operator ? my cousin Destroys EVERYONE in her Tanks, and Lav..... your just not using them right I'm sure...I'd say they need abit more armor/shielding than they do have starting out. but other th...
- by KenKaniff69 - at 2013.07.21 16:17:00
|
1289. CCP's Failure to Lead on Vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Canari Elphus wrote: I was hoping for an intelligent conversation on this but silly me ...because game forum There is no point to having a balanced conversation anymore. Go check out take cover or die's tank petition. Loads of good ideas. Ho...
- by KenKaniff69 - at 2013.07.21 16:05:00
|
1290. CCP's Failure to Lead on Vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Xero The Mishima wrote: KenKaniff69 wrote: Xero The Mishima wrote: Any game you can joyride and go 16-0 is unacceptable. Regardless how few times it may be who it's against this tactic should NEVER produce those kind of results. NEVER in ...
- by KenKaniff69 - at 2013.07.21 15:49:00
|
1291. CCP's Failure to Lead on Vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Xero The Mishima wrote: Any game you can joyride and go 16-0 is unacceptable. Regardless how few times it may be who it's against this tactic should NEVER produce those kind of results. NEVER in any shooter. AV or not. In BF vehicles were OP as...
- by KenKaniff69 - at 2013.07.21 15:30:00
|
1292. CCP's Failure to Lead on Vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Xero The Mishima wrote: Vehicles are too OP in this game. Not wasting my time to list just how UP they are. Ever hear of a calculator? Crunch the numbers and STFU
- by KenKaniff69 - at 2013.07.21 15:11:00
|
1293. CCP's Failure to Lead on Vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
DUST Fiend wrote: As a former dropship pilot and someone who now owns an Ishukone, I can safely say I have no faith in CCPs ability to properly balance Vehicles and AV. My next step might be to get some Proto forge guns since they seem to be...
- by KenKaniff69 - at 2013.07.21 15:05:00
|
1294. CCP's Failure to Lead on Vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
More health and less repping would just be buffer tanking in EVE terms. I want a massive amount of PG to increase my survivability and the existing armor reps to stay. My 50 ton piece of reinforced hardened steel should take the entire team to tak...
- by KenKaniff69 - at 2013.07.21 14:55:00
|
1295. CCP's Failure to Lead on Vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
EternalRMG wrote: KenKaniff69 wrote: EternalRMG wrote: I agree with all your points (besides firing people, i belive in second chances and i think, that 1.4 will be blam!` second chance) They have both shown continually to be out of to...
- by KenKaniff69 - at 2013.07.21 06:13:00
|
1296. CCP's Failure to Lead on Vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Skihids wrote: I don't know how to make CCP listen. Nearly every dropship pilot specced out of flying in the last opportunity and we still have only a vague promise of a rebalance. Keep asking, but skill an infantry fit so you have something ...
- by KenKaniff69 - at 2013.07.21 06:07:00
|
1297. CCP's Failure to Lead on Vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
EternalRMG wrote: I agree with all your points (besides firing people, i belive in second chances and i think, that 1.4 will be blam!` second chance) They have both shown continually to be out of touch with the community. If they were to dri...
- by KenKaniff69 - at 2013.07.21 06:00:00
|
1298. CCP's Failure to Lead on Vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Michael Arck wrote: lol did this guy said "show some respect"? Ok mr. tough guy. I don't know what "respect" you think needs to be shown. I swear some of you guys were probably the male cheerleaders in school Well, they respect your decisi...
- by KenKaniff69 - at 2013.07.21 05:53:00
|
1299. PROOF that AV is OP - in General Discussions [original thread]
Lt Royal wrote: DAMIOS82 wrote: two 11 % anti damage modules I think not; The game doesn't let you fit more than one Damage Control onto any vehicle. I believe he is running two passive resist plating modules...
- by KenKaniff69 - at 2013.07.21 05:34:00
|
1300. CCP's Failure to Lead on Vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
I am sure a lot of people were drawn to Dust based on the many trailers containing several HAVs and dropships as they stormed the battlefield. They are shown fighting each other, infantry, and even the environment. I too was amazed at this and ski...
- by KenKaniff69 - at 2013.07.21 05:28:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |