Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 |
461. internal error disbanned - in General Discussions [original thread]
wut
- by Free Beers - at 2013.04.02 07:16:00
|
462. Plantary Conquest according to Beers - in General Discussions [original thread]
updated addition resistance fund Idea to allow third parties to donate to it. IE similar to eve bounty system
- by Free Beers - at 2013.04.02 00:33:00
|
463. Plantary Conquest according to Beers - in General Discussions [original thread]
@ buster & Rasatsu just wanted to jump again. I am trying to avoid the size of corps/alliance/coalitions all together. A district requres x amount of effort and activity to maintain/defend it and y amount to farm isk to max/isk. what you do...
- by Free Beers - at 2013.04.02 00:20:00
|
464. Which racial Dropsuit are you most looking forward to? - in General Discussions [original thread]
the one that scrubs that suck at dust will complain about the most. Thats the one
- by Free Beers - at 2013.04.01 21:08:00
|
465. Plantary Conquest according to Beers - in General Discussions [original thread]
/me will wait patiently till ccp returns from holiday
- by Free Beers - at 2013.04.01 19:13:00
|
466. AFK farming - good reason to reset SP for all when final game launches - in General Discussions [original thread]
XeroTheBigBoss wrote: As I said quite a few times IF CCP does not do a complete wipe that is fine I am not getting creamed and I am in PFB so I am clearly doing quite well for myself on Dust lol. I am already playing with the weakest suit in th...
- by Free Beers - at 2013.04.01 16:49:00
|
467. Plantary Conquest according to Beers - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mavado V Noriega wrote: pfft not all telc ideas are good, he plays darkfall after all and bad games like defiance he also plays warframe. /me just gave telc credit because all he wants it to take peopls stuff in dust
- by Free Beers - at 2013.04.01 16:25:00
|
468. Plantary Conquest according to Beers - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mavado V Noriega wrote: Free Beers wrote: Pilliage mechanic (aka telc takes your stuff): The idea is that if a corp attacks a district and wins the battle they have the option to continue seige or pillage and leave. If you select pilliage an...
- by Free Beers - at 2013.04.01 15:39:00
|
469. Alternate Accounts - in General Discussions [original thread]
i have 11 accounts and have directors role in 5 different corps. /me inserts cat watching you jackoff from ceiling gif
- by Free Beers - at 2013.04.01 00:27:00
|
470. Plantary Conquest according to Beers - in General Discussions [original thread]
Icy Xenosmilus wrote: Alliances need their power, but if a small corp beats a large alliance, it should be able to hurt it pretty bad, or the smaller alliance should be rewarded bonus. power doesn't come from just having numbers. Power is d...
- by Free Beers - at 2013.04.01 00:21:00
|
471. Plantary Conquest according to Beers - in General Discussions [original thread]
Laheon wrote: Agreed re: not punishing large alliances. The "punishments" would come from the metagame, e.g. organising the alliance, maintaining hold on all the planets you want, and making sure spies don't infiltrate the alliance and do a BoB...
- by Free Beers - at 2013.04.01 00:19:00
|
472. Plantary Conquest according to Beers - in General Discussions [original thread]
in the begining the loot/reward/resources need /will/ be dust centric. I know the day will come when resources from planets will be in demand by eve pilots(as eve nerd i can't wait). It just can't happen right away. Dust economy needs to be stable...
- by Free Beers - at 2013.04.01 00:14:00
|
473. Plantary Conquest according to Beers - in General Discussions [original thread]
updated with additional mechanics: resistance fund & pilliage
- by Free Beers - at 2013.03.31 23:37:00
|
474. Unreal vs. PFBHz tonight at 10 PM EDT - in General Discussions [original thread]
Zekain Kade wrote: Why is this thread still alive? It's all E'cplise's fault
- by Free Beers - at 2013.03.31 20:37:00
|
475. Plantary Conquest according to Beers - in General Discussions [original thread]
Buster Friently wrote: Having said all this, I don't want to further hijack Free Beers' thread with my tweak to his idea. I am listening (or reading to be exact) I started this for a discussion and thats what we are all having. I am tryi...
- by Free Beers - at 2013.03.30 04:18:00
|
476. Plantary Conquest according to Beers - in General Discussions [original thread]
Buster Friently wrote: I'm going to jump in here again, and mention that you've sorta contradicted yourself here. I am in a small corp. No, I don't want to be in a large corp. Currently, nullsec in Eve has very little room for a corp like min...
- by Free Beers - at 2013.03.29 22:54:00
|
477. Plantary Conquest according to Beers - in General Discussions [original thread]
Baal Roo wrote: I get your point, I was simply trying to provide a counterpoint that didn't seem to have been addressed yet in the thread. It was looking a bit circlejerky. I tried to be as general as possible(and wanted to fit it all in o...
- by Free Beers - at 2013.03.29 22:45:00
|
478. Plantary Conquest according to Beers - in General Discussions [original thread]
Baal Roo wrote: I don't think it's quite fair to say something is "broken" if it doesn't happen to work exactly the way YOU want it to work. Some of us actually enjoy the politics and metagame of managing larger groups and working together as l...
- by Free Beers - at 2013.03.29 22:28:00
|
479. Unreal vs. PFBHz tonight at 10 PM EDT - in General Discussions [original thread]
um hello can we please just get back to hating on the imps. PFB isn't on our troll-hole level man. Come on, who doesn't love Gizmos man boobs? Jeezus PFB talks a little trash and suddenly everyone wants to pvp them in the forums. come at me Nigh...
- by Free Beers - at 2013.03.29 21:49:00
|
480. Plantary Conquest according to Beers - in General Discussions [original thread]
Buster Friently wrote: I agree wholeheartedly. The only point that I'd like to make is that the cost of maintaining control of a district should not increase linearly with the number controlled. The cost should increase exponentially such that ...
- by Free Beers - at 2013.03.29 21:06:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |