| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 |
421. Dust 514 league 2016 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Panthrax Oblivion wrote: American football. Great now I have to put that up there Don't blame the world, blame America for naming things poorly.
- by Derpty Derp - at 2016.07.26 13:54:00
|
422. If you miss dust so much..... - in General Discussions [original thread]
I don't think modern hamsters are compatible with those servers... What would you use to run it?
- by Derpty Derp - at 2016.07.24 20:11:00
|
423. On a scale of 1 to 10 - in General Discussions [original thread]
One Eyed King wrote: Double. Well, forum lag still exists... People still blaming lag for bad forum skills, better git gud scrub!
- by Derpty Derp - at 2016.07.24 11:43:00
|
424. On a scale of 1 to 10 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Lightning35 Delta514 wrote: Ripley Riley wrote: Scale from 1 to 10? What is the number for "No idea who the **** you are"? ^^^ -10 maybe I knew language skills were bad here... But -10 being between 2 positive numbers... We lack maths too?
- by Derpty Derp - at 2016.07.23 18:49:00
|
425. Found this gem - in General Discussions [original thread]
byte modal wrote: CCP LogicLoop wrote: I found this gem on the internet. Petrified candy corn? Proof that Halloween dates back farther than realized. When dinosaurs went out to trick-or-treat, where did they find bed sheets large enough...
- by Derpty Derp - at 2016.07.22 21:51:00
|
426. Project Nova: Yes or No? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mobius Wyvern wrote: Considering that CCP LogicLoop has been making frequent appearances in the Dust 514 Veterans Discord server and talking about working on concepts and experimenting with "things", I think it's safe to assume work is being d...
- by Derpty Derp - at 2016.07.22 19:39:00
|
427. Found this gem - in General Discussions [original thread]
CCP LogicLoop wrote: I found this gem on the internet. You've been had, it's clearly plastic.
- by Derpty Derp - at 2016.07.22 10:04:00
|
428. Your battle style/vids - in General Discussions [original thread]
I mastered the art of tactical stupidity... If something is so stupid no one would expect you to do it, you have the advantage of surprise. Also, if everyone is doing one thing, do something completely different. With the occasional match spen...
- by Derpty Derp - at 2016.07.21 14:01:00
|
429. Rework ADS, HAVs require main gunner, LAV passengers can shoot, etc - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mobius Wyvern wrote: It really is pretty cool we've been having a discussion this long. As sad as it makes me to think about sometimes, I think losing one of our favorite games had the effect of making us nicer to each other. Nah, I think (...
- by Derpty Derp - at 2016.07.18 18:04:00
|
430. Rework ADS, HAVs require main gunner, LAV passengers can shoot, etc - in General Discussions [original thread]
byte modal wrote: I thought we (they?) were already doing that on page 1. ? Only scrubs read page 1... scrub...
- by Derpty Derp - at 2016.07.18 07:33:00
|
431. Rework ADS, HAVs require main gunner, LAV passengers can shoot, etc - in General Discussions [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: Crapcrapcrap quick, someone call someone a no-skill scrub! I vote Medico, everyone loved it when he called someone a scrub... I miss Medico... that lovely skraaaaaab.
- by Derpty Derp - at 2016.07.17 19:59:00
|
432. GRRRR - in General Discussions [original thread]
If it's your game, surely you are making it? In which case, hurry up and make your game!
- by Derpty Derp - at 2016.07.17 10:24:00
|
433. Rework ADS, HAVs require main gunner, LAV passengers can shoot, etc - in General Discussions [original thread]
Nomed Deeps wrote: Back to vehicle spawning, it could have easily decreased lag if there were ground vehicle spawns you could buy in while in war barge. Would also have been good if vehicle drops were limited per match (not counting initial ve...
- by Derpty Derp - at 2016.07.15 22:54:00
|
434. Rework ADS, HAVs require main gunner, LAV passengers can shoot, etc - in General Discussions [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: I would say if you lose lock, missiles go on terminal ballistic path. IE they fly straight and fast in whatever direction they were pointed. As long as they're designed not to fire forwards this would be fine, otherwise ...
- by Derpty Derp - at 2016.07.15 08:51:00
|
435. Rework ADS, HAVs require main gunner, LAV passengers can shoot, etc - in General Discussions [original thread]
Scheneighnay McBob wrote: As far as missiles not rendering, that was a PS3 issue above anything else. The missiles would be fired from beyond projectile/effect rendering distance, and then move in faster than the PS3's GPU could process them. ...
- by Derpty Derp - at 2016.07.15 08:36:00
|
436. Rework ADS, HAVs require main gunner, LAV passengers can shoot, etc - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mobius Wyvern wrote: A properly designed Fire-and-Forget weapon would have restrictions in turning most importantly such that you can out-turn the missiles if you fly well. Countermeasures like flares and chaff should also be available to try ...
- by Derpty Derp - at 2016.07.14 22:35:00
|
437. Rework ADS, HAVs require main gunner, LAV passengers can shoot, etc - in General Discussions [original thread]
Thaddeus Reynolds wrote: Breakin Stuff's Escelation of Force reasoning makes sense from a gameplay perspective...especially if the LAV is made so that it isn't trivial to take out even with AV weaponry I highly doubt he wants to buff its def...
- by Derpty Derp - at 2016.07.13 17:43:00
|
438. Rework ADS, HAVs require main gunner, LAV passengers can shoot, etc - in General Discussions [original thread]
Fox Gaden wrote: It seems a little odd to require specialized AV weapons to take out a jeep. That depends, a lot of comparisons here are using "real world" arguments... But in this fictional universe what if the LAV is actually made of the ...
- by Derpty Derp - at 2016.07.13 15:03:00
|
439. Rework ADS, HAVs require main gunner, LAV passengers can shoot, etc - in General Discussions [original thread]
Fox Gaden wrote: Derpty Derp wrote: it seems like a bad design decision to allow bullets aimed at the license plate to deal enough damage to disable the whole vehicle, even if it wasn't a super high tech, futuristic vehicle. I would be fi...
- by Derpty Derp - at 2016.07.13 14:51:00
|
440. Rework ADS, HAVs require main gunner, LAV passengers can shoot, etc - in General Discussions [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: Derpty Derp wrote: Living up to your name Quit cherry-picking things and then taking the quote out of context to prove your point. Your arguments have been absolutely one-sided, and you're bluntly not doing anything ...
- by Derpty Derp - at 2016.07.13 09:20:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |