| Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
The legend345
TeamPlayers
Negative-Feedback
4379
   |
Posted - 2014.01.20 20:00:00 -
[1] - Quote
So if i shoot my proto blaster at a shield tank with one hardener activated then it continues to rep while i'm shooting. Is this because there is a minimum damage requirement for shield tanks passive reps to stop. I was wonder if anybody can get me confirmation on this.
So if this is the case would a damage modded (1 damage mod) proto blaster stop the reps of a shield tank (passive reps) with one hardener activated.
-Thanks in advanced
GôÉGô¥GôÿGô£Gôö > GôÉGô¢Gô¢
Gÿà¿When will dust get better?Gÿà
Uprising God of Tanking Oculus Rift
|
MrShooter01
Storm Wind Strikeforce
Caldari State
448
|
Posted - 2014.01.20 20:24:00 -
[2] - Quote
I'd like to know how this is supposed to work too, one time my dropship started taking fire from a blaster installation (no hardeners active) and the shield regen just kept going, overpowering the blaster's damage |
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
3720
|
Posted - 2014.01.20 20:25:00 -
[3] - Quote
I'm going to assume yes.
Though I do understand why they added this feature (To stop people from prevent shield regeneration due to small arms fire, such as Assault Rifle).
If so, then it does need to be reduced. Hardener or no hardener; you should not be able to completely repair through something designed to destroy you.
What Would Larry Do?
He'd probably drink some Quafe...
Goes To Refrigerator
|
Beck Weathers
Ghosts of Dawn
General Tso's Alliance
354
|
Posted - 2014.01.20 20:26:00 -
[4] - Quote
Well It would be nice to know the exact number of damage needed to stop shield regen first, inda hard to guestimate without it. |
Tebu Gan
Dem Durrty Boyz
Renegade Alliance
431
|
Posted - 2014.01.20 20:50:00 -
[5] - Quote
The legend345 wrote:So if i shoot my proto blaster at a shield tank with one hardener activated then it continues to rep while i'm shooting. Is this because there is a minimum damage requirement for shield tanks passive reps to stop. I was wonder if anybody can get me confirmation on this.
So if this is the case would a damage modded (1 damage mod) proto blaster stop the reps of a shield tank (passive reps) with one hardener activated.
-Thanks in advanced
What is 60% of 136 (proto blaster)
81.6, this is how much damage get's negated
54.4 is how much get's through (range also plays a part in this)
So yeah, what happens if they pop another hardeners on, you do even less.
54 is like a proto weapon of certain kinds.
Nuff Said
|
Cedric Reeg
Black Phoenix Mercenaries
Legacy Rising
10
|
Posted - 2014.01.20 20:52:00 -
[6] - Quote
From what it sounds like you met a shield tank running more than 1 hardener. That is my assumption at least since i've run a shield tank before with 3x hardeners and my passive shield rep goes back up even under that high of dps. Visually though you don't see the other 1-2 hardeners being activated either since (from my experience) they all have the same animation so it doesn't add another layer of visuals just the resistence goes up.
Blasters are not ment to be AV weapons either. A viable weapon against other tanks, but not optimal. |
8213
0uter.Heaven
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
1404
|
Posted - 2014.01.20 20:55:00 -
[7] - Quote
This is also a good point for a Plasma Cannon buff.
Because your shields can come back 75% by the time the shooter has reloaded.
Fish in a bucket!
|
Eltra Ardell
Goonfeet
Special Planetary Emergency Response Group
293
|
Posted - 2014.01.20 20:56:00 -
[8] - Quote
Atiim wrote:I'm going to assume yes.
Though I do understand why they added this feature (To stop people from prevent shield regeneration due to small arms fire, such as Assault Rifle).
If so, then it does need to be reduced. Hardener or no hardener; you should not be able to completely repair through something designed to destroy you.
Blasters are not AV weapons. Blasters are anti-infantry. The high amount of damage they do allows them to destroy vehicles and installations in a pinch, but the weapons that are designed for AV are the Railgun and the Large Missile.
A vehicle should be able to shrug off an anti-infantry weapon. |
The legend345
TeamPlayers
Negative-Feedback
4380
|
Posted - 2014.01.20 21:06:00 -
[9] - Quote
Eltra Ardell wrote:Atiim wrote:I'm going to assume yes.
Though I do understand why they added this feature (To stop people from prevent shield regeneration due to small arms fire, such as Assault Rifle).
If so, then it does need to be reduced. Hardener or no hardener; you should not be able to completely repair through something designed to destroy you. Blasters are not AV weapons. Blasters are anti-infantry. The high amount of damage they do allows them to destroy vehicles and installations in a pinch, but the weapons that are designed for AV are the Railgun and the Large Missile. A vehicle should be able to shrug off an anti-infantry weapon.
its a cannon not a peashooter. Balance shouldn't be that overpowering.
GôÉGô¥GôÿGô£Gôö > GôÉGô¢Gô¢
Gÿà¿When will dust get better?Gÿà
Uprising God of Tanking Oculus Rift
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |