| Pages: [1] 2 |
1. For the CPM - Overhauling PC Districts - in The Council's Chamber [original thread]
Maken Tosch wrote: Ok, then what recommendation for overhauling PC do you have that will allow small corps to compete but eliminate the ATM-like behavior of the PC system we have now? Keep in mind that as of right now all of Molden heath is loc...
- by Bendtner92 - at 2014.03.01 22:36:00
|
2. For the CPM - Overhauling PC Districts - in The Council's Chamber [original thread]
I might as well tell you right now that CCP is not even going to consider something like that idea. CCP wants small corps to be able to compete which is why we have that 1 hour only reinforcement window. Removing that would litterally destroy tho...
- by Bendtner92 - at 2014.03.01 22:15:00
|
3. Solution to Hardener stacking issue (CPM feedback requested) - in The Council's Chamber [original thread]
RedBleach LeSanglant wrote: as after a minute of being king they would also be vulnerable. Except that they aren't. Three Shield Hardeners will keep a Gunnlogi hardened at all times. Even just two would only give a 15 second window after 60 ...
- by Bendtner92 - at 2014.02.20 08:47:00
|
4. Solution to Hardener stacking issue (CPM feedback requested) - in The Council's Chamber [original thread]
Limit vehicles to a single hardener.
- by Bendtner92 - at 2014.02.18 08:15:00
|
5. CPM Weekly Activity Reports - in The Council's Chamber [original thread]
DeeJay One wrote: Zyrus Amalomyn wrote: Shadow of War88 wrote: Sad to see the player population drastically decline from 10k to our current 2-3k. Blame the devs stubborn refusal to jump to the PS4 ASAP. I'm not playing on the PS3 for...
- by Bendtner92 - at 2014.01.28 06:41:00
|
6. 1.7 Respec Feedback - in The Council's Chamber [original thread]
Viktor Hadah Jr wrote: That's a whole lot of crying that can be summarized in "QQ it's just not fair! I want respec because I messed up my skills and it's CCP's fault" More like wondering why pilots can skill out of vehicles while infantry ca...
- by Bendtner92 - at 2013.12.06 17:36:00
|
7. 1.7 respec - in The Council's Chamber [original thread]
daishi mk03 wrote: A full respec for everybody is not the same treatment for everybody, following the same arguments you field. The vet will be able to reallocate 30m SP. The new player will be able to reallocate his 1m SP. Not fair. Facepa...
- by Bendtner92 - at 2013.12.02 20:59:00
|
8. 1.7 respec - in The Council's Chamber [original thread]
daishi mk03 wrote: CCP is not giving some players (pilots) a full respec. They refund SP spent into certain skills for all players. A pilot without SP into vehicles will get nothing. An infantry man with 2m SP into vehicles will get 2m SP, an ...
- by Bendtner92 - at 2013.12.02 20:44:00
|
9. 1.7 respec - in The Council's Chamber [original thread]
daishi mk03 wrote: It's not like players don't want a respec for themself .. they don't want a respec for anyone. e.g. there is this flaylock guy, killing you day after day, then flaylock gets nerfed because it was b*s* and now this guy should ...
- by Bendtner92 - at 2013.12.02 20:34:00
|
10. 1.7 respec - in The Council's Chamber [original thread]
daishi mk03 wrote: They majority of dust players doesn't want a respec of any kind. So a partial respec is more than we could ever dream of. Made up statistics are always fun to see. However you're likely right, but that is likely only becau...
- by Bendtner92 - at 2013.12.02 20:12:00
|
11. 1.7 respec - in The Council's Chamber [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: I know for fact the one in may was a total 2.0 sort of deal in terms of the tree which is probably why we got it then. This one we're chopping off a branch and replacing it. A strength in 2.0 but In my opinion a creative ...
- by Bendtner92 - at 2013.12.02 20:04:00
|
12. 1.7 respec - in The Council's Chamber [original thread]
@CPM. Do you think it's possible to get some answers as to why we got a (optional) full respec for these skill tree changes back in May, but we can't get one now? Tbh I fail to see how the changes back in May warranted a full respec when the 1...
- by Bendtner92 - at 2013.12.02 17:27:00
|
13. 1.7 respec - in The Council's Chamber [original thread]
I still can't believe this is how CCP chooses to treat their players. Thanks for trying to talk sense into CCP, but I see it's a lost cause.
- by Bendtner92 - at 2013.12.01 08:05:00
|
14. 1.7 respec - in The Council's Chamber [original thread]
I've yet to see a reasonable response to why pilots should be able to skill out of vehicles if they don't like the changes, but infantry shouldn't be able to skill into vehicles if they like the changes. That is so backwards and should warrant a ...
- by Bendtner92 - at 2013.11.28 19:23:00
|
15. 1.7 respec - in The Council's Chamber [original thread]
CCP and a part of the CPM is completely missing the point. This has nothing to do with being for or against respecs in general. The vehicle skill tree is being radically changed, so much that a refund of all the SP invested into it is required. T...
- by Bendtner92 - at 2013.11.28 10:13:00
|
16. 1.7 respec - in The Council's Chamber [original thread]
Why no CCP statement? Yes, I know I'm impatient, but 1.7 is coming up soon and this is a serious issue.
- by Bendtner92 - at 2013.11.26 10:28:00
|
17. 1.7 respec - in The Council's Chamber [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: I just want to avoid the free candy addiction syndrome for the time being. Maybe when all the suits come out a free respec then. Id be pretty upset if we have a respec a month. It's either that or the refunded SP can o...
- by Bendtner92 - at 2013.11.24 15:04:00
|
18. 1.7 respec - in The Council's Chamber [original thread]
Nova Knife wrote: You actually posted this while we were in a meeting, and the topic of respecs came up around the tail end of it. Most of the CPM agrees with you completely that they should do a full rspec, and I took the opportunity to plug t...
- by Bendtner92 - at 2013.11.23 14:06:00
|
19. 1.7 respec - in The Council's Chamber [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: Are they overhauling everything about infantry? No. Are they adding SP sinks to infantry? No. The reason infantry complains about respects is to take their SP out of the current flavor of the month to skill into the next one...
- by Bendtner92 - at 2013.11.21 20:16:00
|
20. 1.7 respec - in The Council's Chamber [original thread]
If the CPM hasn't and still are letting CCP know that the respec coming in 1.7 is completely unfair and has several problems, I urge you to tell CCP and try to get the respec changed. I summed it up in a small post here , but people have also ad...
- by Bendtner92 - at 2013.11.21 08:12:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |